"affordable to" vs "affordable for"

Question

"affordable to" vs "affordable for"

Both 'affordable for' and 'affordable to' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Affordable for' is used when talking about the price of something in relation to a specific group of people, while 'affordable to' is used when discussing the ability of an individual or group to pay for something.

Last Updated: March 27, 2024

Use 'affordable to' when discussing the ability of an individual or group to pay for something. For example, 'The rent is affordable to most tenants.'

Examples:

The house is affordable to first-time buyers.
The healthcare plan is affordable to low-income families.
The tuition fees are affordable to international students.
The concert tickets are affordable to music lovers.
The gym membership is affordable to young adults.

Alternatives:

within the financial means of
within reach of
manageable for
able to afford
within the budget of

Use 'affordable for' when discussing the price of something in relation to a specific group of people. For example, 'This car is affordable for students.'

Examples:

Housing in this area is affordable for young families.
The restaurant offers meals that are affordable for everyone.
The new smartphone is affordable for most consumers.
The vacation package is affordable for families with children.
The clothing brand is affordable for teenagers.

Alternatives:

economical for
within the budget of
reasonably priced for
accessible for
suitable for the budget of

Answer 1

affordable to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

affordable for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"affordable to" vs "affordable for"

affordable to

affordable for

Related Comparisons