"accessible to" vs "accessible for"

Question

"accessible to" vs "accessible for"

Both 'accessible to' and 'accessible for' are commonly used in English, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Accessible to' is used to indicate that something can be reached or entered by a particular group of people, while 'accessible for' is used to suggest that something is available or suitable for a particular purpose.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

Use 'accessible to' when indicating that something can be reached or entered by a particular group of people. For example, 'The building is accessible to wheelchair users.'

Examples:

The information is accessible to all employees.
The park is accessible to the public.
The website is accessible to people with disabilities.
The library is accessible to students and faculty.
The event is accessible to everyone.

Alternatives:

available to
open to
reachable by
attainable by
within reach of

Use 'accessible for' when suggesting that something is available or suitable for a particular purpose. For example, 'This program is accessible for beginners.'

Examples:

The new software is accessible for users of all levels.
The course is accessible for students with different learning styles.
The playground is accessible for children of all abilities.
The event is accessible for families with young children.
The website is accessible for people who speak multiple languages.

Alternatives:

suitable for
available for
appropriate for
fit for
convenient for

Answer 1

accessible to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

accessible for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"accessible to" vs "accessible for"

accessible to

accessible for

Related Comparisons