"abdication of" vs "the abdication of"

Question

"abdication of" vs "the abdication of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Abdication of" is used when referring to a specific abdication without specifying the noun that abdicated, while "the abdication of" is used when referring to a specific abdication with the noun that abdicated included.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used when talking about the act of abdicating the throne or giving up power without mentioning the specific person or entity that abdicated.

Examples:

The abdication of King Edward VIII in 1936 was a significant event in British history.
The abdication of responsibility by the government led to chaos.
The abdication of power can have far-reaching consequences.

Alternatives:

the act of abdicating
the relinquishment of
the giving up of

This phrase is used when talking about a specific abdication and mentioning the noun that abdicated, such as a person, monarch, or entity.

Examples:

The abdication of King Edward VIII in 1936 was a significant event in British history.
The abdication of the throne by Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands was unexpected.
The abdication of power by the dictator marked the end of an era.

Alternatives:

the act of abdicating by
the relinquishment of by
the giving up of by

Answer 1

abdication of

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific abdication without specifying the noun that abdicated.

Answer 2

the abdication of

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific abdication with the noun that abdicated included.

"abdication of" vs "the abdication of"

abdication of

the abdication of

Related Comparisons