"director of" vs "director for"

Question

"director of" vs "director for"

Both 'director for' and 'director of' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Director of' is more commonly used to indicate the position someone holds within an organization or company. On the other hand, 'director for' is used to specify the purpose or target of the director's actions.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the position someone holds within an organization or company. For example, 'She is the director of marketing.'

Examples:

He is the director of the company.
She is the director of the department.
He is the director of operations.
She is the director of finance.
He is the director of the film.

Alternatives:

leader of
head of
chief of
manager of
supervisor of

This phrase is used to indicate the purpose or target of the director's actions. For example, 'He is the director for marketing strategies.'

Examples:

She is the director for community outreach.
He is the director for business development.
She is the director for social media.
He is the director for the upcoming project.
She is the director for the event planning committee.

Alternatives:

head of
in charge of
responsible for
leading
managing

Answer 1

director of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the position someone holds within an organization or company.

Answer 2

director for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to specify the purpose or target of the director's actions.

"director of" vs "director for"

director of

director for

Related Comparisons