"consultant for" vs "consultant on"

Question

"consultant for" vs "consultant on"

Both "consultant on" and "consultant for" are commonly used phrases in English, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Consultant on" is used when referring to the specific topic or area that the consultant is providing advice or expertise on, while "consultant for" is used to indicate the person, organization, or entity that the consultant is working with or providing services to.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

Use "consultant for" when indicating the person, organization, or entity that the consultant is working with or providing services to. For example, "He is a consultant for a large tech company."

Examples:

She is a consultant for a non-profit organization.
He works as a consultant for a financial institution.
They hired a consultant for their marketing campaign.
The company brought in a consultant for a project.
She was hired as a consultant for the government.

Alternatives:

adviser for
expert for
specialist for
professional for

Use "consultant on" when referring to the specific topic or area that the consultant is providing advice or expertise on. For example, "She is a consultant on environmental sustainability."

Examples:

He is a consultant on digital marketing strategies.
She is a consultant on healthcare policy.
They hired a consultant on renewable energy.
The company brought in a consultant on organizational development.
The government appointed a consultant on urban planning.

Alternatives:

expert on
specialist in
adviser on
professional in

Answer 1

consultant for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

consultant on

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"consultant for" vs "consultant on"

consultant for

consultant on

Related Comparisons