"Supposed to call" vs "You were supposed to"

Question

"Supposed to call" vs "You were supposed to"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'You were supposed to' is a complete sentence that can be used to express disappointment or frustration when someone didn't do something they were expected to do. 'Supposed to call' is a fragment that can be part of a sentence, indicating an obligation or expectation to make a phone call.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is used to express an intention or expectation to make a phone call. It can be followed by details about who is supposed to call and the purpose of the call.

Examples:

I was supposed to call the client this morning.
She was supposed to call her parents last night.
He was supposed to call the doctor for an appointment.
We were supposed to call the restaurant to make a reservation.
They were supposed to call the police for help.

This phrase is used to convey a sense of unmet expectations or unfulfilled obligations. It is often followed by an action that was expected but not carried out.

Examples:

You were supposed to clean your room before going out.
You were supposed to pick me up from the airport.
You were supposed to finish the report by yesterday.
You were supposed to help me with the project.
You were supposed to be here an hour ago.

Answer 1

Supposed to call

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate an obligation or expectation to make a phone call. It is often part of a sentence describing a planned or expected action.

Answer 2

You were supposed to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to express disappointment or frustration when someone didn't do something they were expected to do.

"Supposed to call" vs "You were supposed to"

Supposed to call

You were supposed to

Related Comparisons