"would have been taken" vs "would have been carried"

Question

"would have been taken" vs "would have been carried"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Would have been carried' is used when referring to transporting something or someone, while 'would have been taken' is used when referring to the action of taking something or someone. They are both commonly used in English.

Last Updated: March 08, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that something or someone would have been taken by someone else in the past.

Examples:

The stolen painting would have been taken by the thief if the alarm hadn't gone off.
The lost child would have been taken to the police station by a kind stranger.
The last piece of cake would have been taken by your brother if you hadn't grabbed it first.

Alternatives:

would have been removed
would have been seized
would have been appropriated

This phrase is used to indicate that something or someone would have been transported from one place to another in the past.

Examples:

The luggage would have been carried by the porter if you had requested assistance.
The injured hiker would have been carried down the mountain by the rescue team.
The heavy boxes would have been carried upstairs by the movers.

Alternatives:

would have been transported
would have been conveyed
would have been moved

Answer 1

would have been taken

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the action of taking something or someone.

Answer 2

would have been carried

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to transporting something or someone.

"would have been taken" vs "would have been carried"

would have been taken

would have been carried

Related Comparisons