"would be to increase" vs "would be increasing"

Question

"would be to increase" vs "would be increasing"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Would be to increase' is used to talk about a hypothetical or planned action, while 'would be increasing' is used to discuss a future continuous action. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

This phrase is used to express a hypothetical or planned action that may happen in the future. It indicates an intention or possibility.

Examples:

One option would be to increase the budget for the project.
The best course of action would be to increase the number of staff members.
If we want to succeed, our strategy would be to increase our marketing efforts.

Alternatives:

could be to increase
might be to increase
should be to increase
will be to increase
is to increase

This phrase is used to talk about a future continuous action that is expected to happen. It indicates a trend or ongoing process.

Examples:

By next year, the company would be increasing its production capacity.
The population would be increasing at a steady rate over the next decade.
If we continue on this path, our expenses would be increasing significantly.

Alternatives:

will be increasing
could be increasing
might be increasing
should be increasing
is increasing

Answer 1

would be to increase

This phrase is correct and is used to talk about a hypothetical or planned action.

Answer 2

would be increasing

This phrase is correct and is used to discuss a future continuous action.

"would be to increase" vs "would be increasing"

would be to increase

would be increasing

Related Comparisons