"would still be" vs "would be still"

Question

"would still be" vs "would be still"

Both "would be still" and "would still be" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Would still be" is the more common and natural phrase in English, used to indicate an ongoing state or action in the future. On the other hand, "would be still" can be used in a more formal or poetic context to emphasize the state of being still.

Last Updated: March 27, 2024

This phrase is commonly used to indicate an ongoing state or action in the future. It is the more natural way to express this idea in English.

Examples:

She would still be waiting for the train when you arrive.
The flowers would still be blooming in the garden next week.
The children would still be playing in the park at this time.
The sun would still be shining brightly in the sky tomorrow.
The music would still be playing when the guests arrive.

Alternatives:

would be still
would remain still
would be motionless
would be at rest
would be calm

This phrase can be used to emphasize the state of being still in a more formal or poetic context. It is less commonly used in everyday English.

Examples:

In the quiet of the night, the world would be still.
The painting would be still, frozen in time for all to admire.
The lake would be still, reflecting the beauty of the surrounding mountains.
The old house would be still, holding memories of a bygone era.
The forest would be still, as if time had stopped within its depths.

Alternatives:

would still be
would remain still
would be motionless
would be at rest
would be calm

Answer 1

would still be

This phrase is the more common and natural way to express an ongoing state or action in the future. It is widely used in English.

Answer 2

would be still

This phrase is correct but less common in everyday English. It can be used in a more formal or poetic context to emphasize the state of being still.

"would still be" vs "would be still"

would still be

would be still

Related Comparisons