"would be a cogent answer for" vs "would be a cogent answer to"

Question

"would be a cogent answer for" vs "would be a cogent answer to"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Would be a cogent answer to' is used when referring to the question or issue being addressed, while 'would be a cogent answer for' is used when referring to the person or situation that the answer is intended for.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to the person or situation that the answer is intended for. It indicates that the answer is suitable and convincing for that particular context.

Examples:

Her proposal would be a cogent answer for the company's growth strategy.

Alternatives:

would be a suitable answer for
would be a convincing response for
would be an appropriate solution for
would be a relevant reply for
would be an effective response for

This phrase is used when referring to the question or issue that the answer is addressing. It indicates that the answer is relevant and persuasive in relation to the question.

Examples:

His explanation would be a cogent answer to the problem at hand.

Alternatives:

would be a relevant answer to
would be a persuasive response to
would be a valid solution to
would be an appropriate reply to
would be an effective response to

Answer 1

would be a cogent answer for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

would be a cogent answer to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"would be a cogent answer for" vs "would be a cogent answer to"

would be a cogent answer for

would be a cogent answer to

Related Comparisons