"worked for two years" vs "worked two years long"

Question

"worked for two years" vs "worked two years long"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Worked for two years' is commonly used to indicate the duration of employment or a specific period of work. 'Worked two years long' is less common and may sound awkward to native speakers, as 'long' is not typically used in this context.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to specify the length of time someone has been employed or engaged in work. It indicates a duration of two years.

Examples:

She worked for two years at the company before moving on to a new job.
I have worked for two years as a teacher.
He worked for two years on the project before it was completed.
They worked for two years to save enough money for their trip.
The team worked for two years to achieve their goal.

Alternatives:

worked at the company for two years
worked as a teacher for two years
worked on the project for two years
worked to save enough money for their trip for two years
worked to achieve their goal for two years

This phrase can be used to emphasize the duration of work, but it is less commonly used compared to 'worked for two years.'

Alternatives:

worked for two years
worked continuously for two years
worked non-stop for two years
worked tirelessly for two years
worked diligently for two years

Answer 1

worked for two years

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the duration of employment or a specific period of work.

Answer 2

worked two years long

This phrase is correct but less common in English. It may sound awkward to native speakers as 'long' is not typically used in this context.

"worked for two years" vs "worked two years long"

worked for two years

worked two years long

Related Comparisons