"with mediation" vs "with intermediation"

Question

"with mediation" vs "with intermediation"

Both 'with mediation' and 'with intermediation' are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. 'With mediation' is commonly used in the context of resolving disputes or conflicts, where a neutral third party helps the involved parties reach a mutually acceptable solution. On the other hand, 'with intermediation' is less common and is used in the context of someone acting as an intermediary or middleman in a transaction or negotiation.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

Use 'with mediation' when referring to the involvement of a neutral third party to help resolve disputes or conflicts between two or more parties.

Examples:

The two parties agreed to settle the matter with mediation.
The conflict was resolved with mediation from a professional mediator.

Alternatives:

through mediation
by mediation
using mediation
via mediation
with the help of a mediator

Use 'with intermediation' when referring to someone acting as an intermediary or middleman in a transaction or negotiation.

Examples:

The deal was finalized with intermediation from a trusted advisor.
The negotiation process required skilled intermediation.

Alternatives:

with an intermediary
through an intermediary
by an intermediary
using an intermediary
via an intermediary

Answer 1

with mediation

This phrase is correct and commonly used in the context of resolving disputes or conflicts with the help of a neutral third party.

Answer 2

with intermediation

This phrase is correct but less commonly used. It is used in the context of someone acting as an intermediary or middleman in a transaction or negotiation.

"with mediation" vs "with intermediation"

with mediation

with intermediation

Related Comparisons