Which one is correct?
"with 3 years background" or "with a 3 year background"?

Question

Which one is correct?
"with 3 years background" or "with a 3 year background"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

100% Human-Powered Editing!

This phrase is commonly used in informal contexts to indicate someone has experience or knowledge in a particular field for a period of 3 years.

Examples:

She applied for the job with 3 years background in marketing.
He entered the competition with 3 years background in music.
The candidate presented himself with 3 years background in finance.
They started the project with 3 years background in technology.
The team leader had with 3 years background in project management.

Alternatives:

with a 3 year background
with three years of background
with a background of 3 years
with a 3-year history
with 3 years of experience

This phrase is used in formal contexts to indicate someone has experience or knowledge in a particular field for a period of 3 years.

Examples:

The applicant had with a 3 year background in research.
She came to the company with a 3 year background in sales.
He was hired with a 3 year background in engineering.
The team leader had with a 3 year background in management.
The candidate presented himself with a 3 year background in education.

Alternatives:

with 3 years background
with three years of background
with a background of 3 years
with a 3-year history
with 3 years of experience

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'With 3 years background' is commonly used in informal settings, while 'with a 3 year background' is more formal and grammatically correct. The choice between them depends on the level of formality required.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024