🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

wildtype vs wild-type

Both 'wildtype' and 'wild-type' are correct, but 'wild-type' is more commonly used in scientific contexts. The hyphenated form is preferred when referring to the standard, non-mutated form of a gene or organism.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 1508 views

wildtype

This is a correct term, but less common than 'wild-type'.

It refers to the standard, non-mutated form of a gene or organism. It is used in genetics and biology.
  • The organism used has not been genetically engineered and has been derived from a single wildtype organism Alcaligenes eutrophus strain H16 NCIMB 10442.
  • These isolates expressed a median fold change in EC50 relative to wildtype of 12.0 for atazanavir.

Alternatives:

  • wild-type

wild-type

This is the more commonly used form, especially in scientific contexts.

It refers to the standard, non-mutated form of a gene or organism. It is used in genetics and biology.
  • The safety profile of panitumumab in patients whose tumour express KRAS wild-type (n = 123) was generally consistent with overall mCRC monotherapy set described above.
  • Two percent of patients with KRAS wild-type had diarrhoea reported as severe.
  • (1) Reports have indicated that contracting of wild-type measles during pregnancy enhances foetal risk.
  • Viral resistance to abacavir develops relatively slowly in vitro, requiring multiple mutations for a clinically relevant increase in EC50 over wild-type virus.
  • 1. Live salmonella vaccines shall not be used in the framework of national control programmes where the manufacturer does not provide an appropriate method to distinguish bacteriologically wild-type strains of salmonella from vaccine strains.
  • where the manufacturer does not provide an appropriate method to distinguish bacteriologically wild-type strains of Salmonella from vaccine strains.
  • The difference in median PFS in the KRAS wild-type group was 8 weeks.
  • Antiviral activity: entecavir inhibited HBV DNA synthesis (50% reduction, EC50) at a concentration of 0.004 µM in human HepG2 cells transfected with wild-type HBV.
  • Resistance in cell culture: relative to wild-type HBV, LVDr viruses containing rtM204V and rtL180M substitutions within the reverse transcriptase exhibit 8-fold decreased susceptibility to entecavir.
  • Stable disease rates in the KRAS wild-type group were 34% for panitumumab and 12% for BSC.
  • Further evidence is also awaited regarding the effect of panitumumab in combination with chemotherapy on PFS in patients with wild-type KRAS tumours.
  • Post-exposure vaccination Vaccination of individuals exposed to wild-type measles may provide some protection if the vaccine can be administered within 72 hours after exposure.
  • In the KRAS wild-type group the response rate was 17% for panitumumab and 0% for BSC.
  • This means that further evidence on this medicinal product is awaited, in particular data are required to confirm the effect in patients with wild-type KRAS tumours which is currently supported by a retrospective analysis.
  • Resistance in cell culture: relative to wild-type HBV, LVDr viruses containing rtM204V and rtL180M substitutions within the reverse transcriptase exhibit 8-fold decreased susceptibility to entecavir.
  • There have been reports of SSPE in children who did not have a history of infection with wild-type measles but did receive measles vaccine.
  • 0.37-0.65) in favour of panitumumab in the KRAS wild-type group and 1.07 (95% CI:
  • 14.0, 31.9) for those with KRAS wild-type tumours and 0% (95% CI:
  • The concentration of tenofovir required for 50% inhibition (EC50) of the wild-type laboratory strain HIV-1IIIB is 1-6 µmol/ l in lymphoid cell lines and 1.1 µmol/ l against primary HIV-1 subtype B isolates in PBMCs.
  • In circumstances where contact with high-risk individuals susceptible to varicella is unavoidable, the potential risk of transmission of the varicella vaccine virus should be weighed against the risk of acquiring and transmitting wild-type varicella virus.

Alternatives:

  • wildtype

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!