TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

wildtype vs wild-type

Both 'wildtype' and 'wild-type' are correct, but 'wild-type' is more commonly used in scientific contexts. The hyphenated form is preferred when referring to the standard, non-mutated form of a gene or organism.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 1461 views

wildtype

This is a correct term, but less common than 'wild-type'.

It refers to the standard, non-mutated form of a gene or organism. It is used in genetics and biology.
  • The organism used has not been genetically engineered and has been derived from a single wildtype organism Alcaligenes eutrophus strain H16 NCIMB 10442.
  • These isolates expressed a median fold change in EC50 relative to wildtype of 12.0 for atazanavir.

Alternatives:

  • wild-type

wild-type

This is the more commonly used form, especially in scientific contexts.

It refers to the standard, non-mutated form of a gene or organism. It is used in genetics and biology.
  • The safety profile of panitumumab in patients whose tumour express KRAS wild-type (n = 123) was generally consistent with overall mCRC monotherapy set described above.
  • Two percent of patients with KRAS wild-type had diarrhoea reported as severe.
  • (1) Reports have indicated that contracting of wild-type measles during pregnancy enhances foetal risk.
  • Viral resistance to abacavir develops relatively slowly in vitro, requiring multiple mutations for a clinically relevant increase in EC50 over wild-type virus.
  • 1. Live salmonella vaccines shall not be used in the framework of national control programmes where the manufacturer does not provide an appropriate method to distinguish bacteriologically wild-type strains of salmonella from vaccine strains.
  • where the manufacturer does not provide an appropriate method to distinguish bacteriologically wild-type strains of Salmonella from vaccine strains.
  • The difference in median PFS in the KRAS wild-type group was 8 weeks.
  • Antiviral activity: entecavir inhibited HBV DNA synthesis (50% reduction, EC50) at a concentration of 0.004 µM in human HepG2 cells transfected with wild-type HBV.
  • Resistance in cell culture: relative to wild-type HBV, LVDr viruses containing rtM204V and rtL180M substitutions within the reverse transcriptase exhibit 8-fold decreased susceptibility to entecavir.
  • Stable disease rates in the KRAS wild-type group were 34% for panitumumab and 12% for BSC.
  • Further evidence is also awaited regarding the effect of panitumumab in combination with chemotherapy on PFS in patients with wild-type KRAS tumours.
  • Post-exposure vaccination Vaccination of individuals exposed to wild-type measles may provide some protection if the vaccine can be administered within 72 hours after exposure.
  • In the KRAS wild-type group the response rate was 17% for panitumumab and 0% for BSC.
  • This means that further evidence on this medicinal product is awaited, in particular data are required to confirm the effect in patients with wild-type KRAS tumours which is currently supported by a retrospective analysis.
  • Resistance in cell culture: relative to wild-type HBV, LVDr viruses containing rtM204V and rtL180M substitutions within the reverse transcriptase exhibit 8-fold decreased susceptibility to entecavir.
  • There have been reports of SSPE in children who did not have a history of infection with wild-type measles but did receive measles vaccine.
  • 0.37-0.65) in favour of panitumumab in the KRAS wild-type group and 1.07 (95% CI:
  • 14.0, 31.9) for those with KRAS wild-type tumours and 0% (95% CI:
  • The concentration of tenofovir required for 50% inhibition (EC50) of the wild-type laboratory strain HIV-1IIIB is 1-6 µmol/ l in lymphoid cell lines and 1.1 µmol/ l against primary HIV-1 subtype B isolates in PBMCs.
  • In circumstances where contact with high-risk individuals susceptible to varicella is unavoidable, the potential risk of transmission of the varicella vaccine virus should be weighed against the risk of acquiring and transmitting wild-type varicella virus.

Alternatives:

  • wildtype

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!