"Which would undoubtedly have been" vs "which would have undoubtedly been"

Question

"Which would undoubtedly have been" vs "which would have undoubtedly been"

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different word order. The first phrase 'which would undoubtedly have been' places 'undoubtedly' before 'have been,' while the second phrase 'which would have undoubtedly been' places 'undoubtedly' after 'have been.' The choice between them depends on the emphasis you want to give to the word 'undoubtedly.'

Last Updated: March 08, 2024

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize the certainty of an event or situation that would have occurred in the past.

Alternatives:

which would have certainly been
which would have definitely been
which would have absolutely been
which would have undoubtedly occurred

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize the certainty of an event or situation that would have occurred in the past.

Alternatives:

which would have been undoubtedly
which undoubtedly would have been
which would have been without a doubt
which would have been unquestionably

Answer 1

Which would undoubtedly have been

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

which would have undoubtedly been

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"Which would undoubtedly have been" vs "which would have undoubtedly been"

Which would undoubtedly have been

which would have undoubtedly been

Related Comparisons