"have to be obeyed" vs "which have to be obeyed"

Question

"have to be obeyed" vs "which have to be obeyed"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Which have to be obeyed' is used when referring to specific rules or regulations that must be followed, while 'have to be obeyed' is a more general statement indicating that something must be followed without specifying the rules. Therefore, the choice between the two depends on the level of specificity required in the context.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used when you want to convey that a certain action or requirement must be followed without going into specific details about the rules or regulations.

Examples:

These safety guidelines have to be obeyed at all times.
The instructions given by the teacher have to be obeyed by the students.

Alternatives:

must be followed
need to be adhered to
should be respected
are to be complied with
are required to be followed

This phrase is used when you want to specify particular rules or regulations that must be followed. It adds a level of detail and specificity to the statement.

Examples:

The company has established several policies which have to be obeyed by all employees.
There are certain laws which have to be obeyed by everyone in the country.

Alternatives:

that have to be obeyed
rules that must be followed
regulations that must be adhered to
which must be followed
which must be adhered to

Answer 1

have to be obeyed

This phrase is correct and commonly used in a more general sense to indicate that something must be followed without specifying the rules.

Answer 2

which have to be obeyed

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to specific rules or regulations that must be followed.

"have to be obeyed" vs "which have to be obeyed"

have to be obeyed

which have to be obeyed

Related Comparisons