"which had α" vs "which had α<"

Question

"which had α" vs "which had α<"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "which had α" is used when referring to a specific value of α, while "which had α<" is used when comparing α to another value. Therefore, the choice between the two depends on the intended meaning in the context.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that something possessed a particular value of α in a given context.

Examples:

The experiment, which had α = 0.05, showed significant results.
The study, which had α = 0.01, had a stricter significance level.

Alternatives:

which had a value of α
which had the value of α

This phrase is used to indicate that something possessed a value of α that was less than another specified value.

Examples:

The sample, which had α<0.05, was considered statistically insignificant.
The group, which had α<0.01, did not meet the significance threshold.

Alternatives:

which had a value of α less than
which had a value of α lower than

Answer 1

which had α

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific value of α.

Answer 2

which had α<

This phrase is correct and commonly used when comparing α to another value.

"which had α" vs "which had α<"

which had α

which had α<

Related Comparisons