"when the ratio equals" vs "does not exhibit the advantage"

Question

"when the ratio equals" vs "does not exhibit the advantage"

These two phrases are not comparable as they convey different meanings. The first phrase refers to a specific condition where a ratio is equal to something, while the second phrase talks about a situation where an advantage is not present. They are used in different contexts and cannot be interchanged.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to introduce a condition or scenario where a ratio is equal to a particular number or expression.

Examples:

When the ratio equals 1, the two quantities are in direct proportion.
You need to stop when the ratio equals 2:1.

This phrase is used to describe a situation where a specific benefit or advantage is not apparent or visible.

Examples:

The new product does not exhibit the advantage we were hoping for.
In this case, the strategy does not exhibit the advantage of cost-effectiveness.

Answer 1

when the ratio equals

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to describe a situation when a ratio is equal to a specific value.

Answer 2

does not exhibit the advantage

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that a particular advantage is not being shown or demonstrated.

"when the ratio equals" vs "does not exhibit the advantage"

when the ratio equals

does not exhibit the advantage

Related Comparisons