🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

what process should we apply on this matter vs what process should i apply on this matter

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'What process should we apply on this matter?' is used when referring to a group of people deciding on a process, while 'What process should I apply on this matter?' is used when an individual is deciding on a process.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 682 views

what process should we apply on this matter

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a group of people deciding on a process.

This phrase is used when discussing a matter that requires a decision on a process by a group of people.

Examples:

  • What process should we apply on this matter as a team?
  • As a committee, what process should we apply on this matter?
  • In our department meeting, what process should we apply on this matter?
  • So why should we apply it when we cannot defend Europe?
  • We all need to weigh up the facts, but what standards should we apply?
  • But what method should we apply to choose the method of voting?
  • When the Commission - and Parliament - organises seminars with 'high-level' groups, should we apply a rule to ensure an equal gender balance among the speakers.
  • I also wish to draw special attention to the fact that the amendment that alludes to this matter states in the justification section that this process should not be considered to have any adverse effect on vehicles.
  • I shall apply on behalf of my group to the President - and I say this here openly - for this matter to be discussed at the next mini session in Brussels, in the hope that it can be brought to a conclusion during the Swedish Presidency.
  • The European Commission expressly exempts all women's organisations in this programme from any such gradual reduction on the basis of the provisions of the Financial should we apply it, especially to women's organisations other than the European Women's Lobby?
  • That process should continue in the implementation phase.
  • This process should be completed long before 2013.
  • Energy use during the production process should be included.
  • Cooperation under the Copenhagen process should be given fresh impetus.
  • The accreditation process should be objective, transparent and non-discriminatory.
  • Any change of the manufacturing process should be reported.
  • The results of the monitoring and evaluation process should be utilised when implementing the programme.
  • And the entire process should take about 45 minutes.
  • The whole R&D process should be geared to taking that crucial factor into account, failing which its final results could prove unusable.
  • This process should be transparent and open, and ensure maximum multi-stakeholder engagement.
  • The Lamfalussy process should be a means for ensuring this.
  • The review process should be on a more regular basis.
  • This process should not be unnecessarily hindered by new national safety rules.

Alternatives:

  • What process should the team apply on this matter?
  • What process should the group apply on this matter?
  • What process should the committee apply on this matter?

what process should i apply on this matter

This phrase is correct and commonly used when an individual is deciding on a process.

This phrase is used when discussing a matter that requires a decision on a process by an individual.

Examples:

  • What process should I apply on this matter?
  • As the project manager, what process should I apply on this matter?
  • In my role, what process should I apply on this matter?
  • To whom should I apply for an answer to my question?
  • I also wish to draw special attention to the fact that the amendment that alludes to this matter states in the justification section that this process should not be considered to have any adverse effect on vehicles.
  • I shall apply on behalf of my group to the President - and I say this here openly - for this matter to be discussed at the next mini session in Brussels, in the hope that it can be brought to a conclusion during the Swedish Presidency.
  • That process should continue in the implementation phase.
  • This process should be completed long before 2013.
  • Energy use during the production process should be included.
  • Cooperation under the Copenhagen process should be given fresh impetus.
  • The accreditation process should be objective, transparent and non-discriminatory.
  • Any change of the manufacturing process should be reported.
  • The results of the monitoring and evaluation process should be utilised when implementing the programme.
  • And the entire process should take about 45 minutes.
  • The whole R&D process should be geared to taking that crucial factor into account, failing which its final results could prove unusable.
  • This process should be transparent and open, and ensure maximum multi-stakeholder engagement.
  • The Lamfalussy process should be a means for ensuring this.
  • The review process should be on a more regular basis.
  • This process should not be unnecessarily hindered by new national safety rules.
  • Speed is not the sole factor by which the Lamfalussy process should be judged.
  • Also, by early next year a formal process should be established to achieve a comprehensive post-2012 agreement which is legally binding.
  • This process should lead to a strong partnership in foreign and security policy.
  • Any delay in the consultation process should be explained and justified.

Alternatives:

  • What process should the individual apply on this matter?
  • What process should the person apply on this matter?
  • What process should the manager apply on this matter?

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!