TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

were still more likely to vs were more likely to

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Were still more likely to' implies a comparison with a previous situation or group, emphasizing that the likelihood remains higher. 'Were more likely to' simply states a higher probability without reference to a previous condition.

Last updated: April 01, 2024

were still more likely to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to emphasize a higher probability compared to a previous situation or group.

This phrase is used when you want to highlight that the likelihood of something happening is even higher than before or in comparison to another group. It adds a sense of emphasis to the comparison.

Examples:

  • After the training, the participants were still more likely to choose the healthier option.
  • Despite the setbacks, they were still more likely to succeed.
  • Compared to the other teams, they were still more likely to win the championship.

Alternatives:

  • were more likely to
  • remained more likely to
  • continued to be more likely to
  • were even more likely to
  • were consistently more likely to

were more likely to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a higher probability without specific emphasis on a comparison to a previous situation or group.

This phrase is used to simply state that something is more probable to happen without highlighting a comparison to a previous condition or group.

Examples:

  • They were more likely to win the game with their star player back.
  • Students who study regularly are more likely to perform well in exams.
  • People who exercise regularly are more likely to have better health.

Alternatives:

  • had a higher chance of
  • had a greater likelihood of
  • were prone to
  • were apt to
  • were inclined to

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!