were sampled in tubes vs were samples into tubes

The phrases are not directly comparable as they have different structures and meanings. 'Were sampled in tubes' is correct when referring to the action of taking samples and placing them in tubes, while 'were samples into tubes' is incorrect due to the incorrect use of 'samples' as a verb.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 599 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the action of taking samples and placing them in tubes.

"were sampled in tubes"

This phrase is used to describe the process of collecting samples and putting them in tubes for further analysis or storage.

Examples:

The blood samples were sampled in tubes for analysis.
The water samples were sampled in tubes to prevent contamination.

Show examples from the web [+]

These companies were sampled in the original investigation.
The sampled companies in this review that were sampled in the original investigation get the benefit rate established in the original investigation.
Three unrelated importers were sampled and received questionnaires whereas only one replied.
Four of them were sampled, but only one of them submitted an importers questionnaire reply.
Discards shall be sampled in all deep-sea métiers.
7 companies were sampled (5 importers and 2 importing users).
The Food Standards Agency is aware of 415 products that were sampled by local enforcement authorities in 2003 and analysed using standardised detection tests for irradiated food.
In the injury analysis of the original proceeding five European producers were sampled: three French, one Italian and one Portuguese.
A total of 72 TEN-T actions were sampled for compliance testing of the Commission's internal controls.
The three largest importers were sampled, but one importer finally did not provide a meaningful questionnaire reply.
Only three cell producers were sampled and two of them are members of EU ProSun.
In particular, the concentrations of two main perfluorated compounds were sampled: PFOA (perfluorooctane acid) and PFOS (Perfluorooctanesulphonate).
The Commission accepted this claim with the following qualification: from the ten largest exporting producers to the Union, three were sampled.
As mentioned in recital (11) above, three exporting producers were sampled.
As already mentioned in recital 37, from the 21 Union importers that came forward and showed a willingness to cooperate with the investigation, eight were sampled.
Seven companies were sampled, representing 95 % of the imports made by the unrelated cooperating companies.
And in about half an hour, we got five samples, five individual sharks, were sampled using Simon's shark slime sampling system.
Furthermore, the Commission notes that the complaint lists as potential beneficiaries both companies that were sampled and other non-sampled OCS producers located in the relevant area of application.
One interested party claimed that two Union producers that were sampled should be removed from the sample due to their relationship with Argentine exporting producers.
slaughterhouses: total number per country and the number that were sampled,

This phrase is incorrect as 'samples' is used incorrectly as a verb. The correct form would be 'were placed into tubes' or 'were sampled into tubes.'

"were samples into tubes"

Show examples from the web [+]

The breath samples, collected in 10 l glass, plastic sample tubes are analysed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).
Okay? Here's a sample tube, Reuben.
Weigh 2,00 +- 0,001 g of test sample into a centrifuge tube (6.2) or suitable stoppered flask (50 ml).
The breath samples, collected in 10 ml glass- or plastic sample tubes, are analysed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).
By continuously breathing the patient must pull out the straw and immediately close the sample tube with its stopper.
The sample tubes have to be sent in the original packaging, for analysis, to a qualified laboratory.
You know, I could get you some sample tubes of TestosterGel from my work.
You know, I could get you some sample tubes of TestosterGel from my work.
Breathe out through your mouth, using a straw, into the sample tube. iii.
A sample is heated in a sample tube, which is immersed in a liquid in a heat-bath.
Now the patient breathes gently through the straw until the inner surface of the sample tube steams up.
A fused capillary, containing an air bubble in the lower part, is dipped in the sample tube.
The sample tube containing the boiling capillary is fastened either to the thermometer with a rubber band or is fixed with a support from the side (see figure 2).
The particulate sample transfer tube shall be:
Hold the sample tube upright and stick the bar-code label marked "00-minute-value" round the sample tube, so that the lines of the bar-code are horizontal.
A capillary tube (boiling capillary) which is fused about 1 cm above the lower end is placed in the sample tube.
The method can be performed more rapidly as no gel electrophoresis step is required and it reduces the risk of cross contamination as it is possible to estimate the amount of viral genomic RNA within the sample tube.
(If the sample tube remains open for more than 30 seconds, the test result might be falsified.)
Remove the stopper from one of the sample tubes, unwrap the straw and place the straw into the container.
(If the sample tube remains open for more than 30 seconds, the result could be falsified.)

Alternatives:

The samples were placed into tubes.
The samples were sampled into tubes.

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

were sampled in tubes vs were samples into tubes