TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

were sampled in tubes vs were samples into tubes

The phrases are not directly comparable as they have different structures and meanings. 'Were sampled in tubes' is correct when referring to the action of taking samples and placing them in tubes, while 'were samples into tubes' is incorrect due to the incorrect use of 'samples' as a verb.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 493 views

were sampled in tubes

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the action of taking samples and placing them in tubes.

This phrase is used to describe the process of collecting samples and putting them in tubes for further analysis or storage.

Examples:

  • The blood samples were sampled in tubes for analysis.
  • The water samples were sampled in tubes to prevent contamination.
  • These companies were sampled in the original investigation.
  • The sampled companies in this review that were sampled in the original investigation get the benefit rate established in the original investigation.
  • Three unrelated importers were sampled and received questionnaires whereas only one replied.
  • Four of them were sampled, but only one of them submitted an importers questionnaire reply.
  • Discards shall be sampled in all deep-sea métiers.
  • 7 companies were sampled (5 importers and 2 importing users).
  • The Food Standards Agency is aware of 415 products that were sampled by local enforcement authorities in 2003 and analysed using standardised detection tests for irradiated food.
  • In the injury analysis of the original proceeding five European producers were sampled: three French, one Italian and one Portuguese.
  • A total of 72 TEN-T actions were sampled for compliance testing of the Commission's internal controls.
  • The three largest importers were sampled, but one importer finally did not provide a meaningful questionnaire reply.
  • Only three cell producers were sampled and two of them are members of EU ProSun.
  • In particular, the concentrations of two main perfluorated compounds were sampled: PFOA (perfluorooctane acid) and PFOS (Perfluorooctanesulphonate).
  • The Commission accepted this claim with the following qualification: from the ten largest exporting producers to the Union, three were sampled.
  • As mentioned in recital (11) above, three exporting producers were sampled.
  • As already mentioned in recital 37, from the 21 Union importers that came forward and showed a willingness to cooperate with the investigation, eight were sampled.
  • Seven companies were sampled, representing 95 % of the imports made by the unrelated cooperating companies.
  • And in about half an hour, we got five samples, five individual sharks, were sampled using Simon's shark slime sampling system.
  • Furthermore, the Commission notes that the complaint lists as potential beneficiaries both companies that were sampled and other non-sampled OCS producers located in the relevant area of application.
  • One interested party claimed that two Union producers that were sampled should be removed from the sample due to their relationship with Argentine exporting producers.
  • slaughterhouses: total number per country and the number that were sampled,

were samples into tubes

This phrase is incorrect as 'samples' is used incorrectly as a verb. The correct form would be 'were placed into tubes' or 'were sampled into tubes.'

  • The breath samples, collected in 10 l glass, plastic sample tubes are analysed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).
  • Okay? Here's a sample tube, Reuben.
  • Weigh 2,00 +- 0,001 g of test sample into a centrifuge tube (6.2) or suitable stoppered flask (50 ml).
  • The breath samples, collected in 10 ml glass- or plastic sample tubes, are analysed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).
  • By continuously breathing the patient must pull out the straw and immediately close the sample tube with its stopper.
  • The sample tubes have to be sent in the original packaging, for analysis, to a qualified laboratory.
  • You know, I could get you some sample tubes of TestosterGel from my work.
  • You know, I could get you some sample tubes of TestosterGel from my work.
  • Breathe out through your mouth, using a straw, into the sample tube. iii.
  • A sample is heated in a sample tube, which is immersed in a liquid in a heat-bath.
  • Now the patient breathes gently through the straw until the inner surface of the sample tube steams up.
  • A fused capillary, containing an air bubble in the lower part, is dipped in the sample tube.
  • The sample tube containing the boiling capillary is fastened either to the thermometer with a rubber band or is fixed with a support from the side (see figure 2).
  • The particulate sample transfer tube shall be:
  • Hold the sample tube upright and stick the bar-code label marked "00-minute-value" round the sample tube, so that the lines of the bar-code are horizontal.
  • A capillary tube (boiling capillary) which is fused about 1 cm above the lower end is placed in the sample tube.
  • The method can be performed more rapidly as no gel electrophoresis step is required and it reduces the risk of cross contamination as it is possible to estimate the amount of viral genomic RNA within the sample tube.
  • (If the sample tube remains open for more than 30 seconds, the test result might be falsified.)
  • Remove the stopper from one of the sample tubes, unwrap the straw and place the straw into the container.
  • (If the sample tube remains open for more than 30 seconds, the result could be falsified.)

Alternatives:

  • The samples were placed into tubes.
  • The samples were sampled into tubes.

Related Comparisons

regarding to vs in conference are written in all vs is written on all was in attendance vs was on attendance have been included in the curriculum vs were included in the curriculum have been written in vs have been written in Greek were in contrast with vs were in contrast to

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!