were not significant vs were not significantly

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Were not significant' is used when referring to the importance or relevance of something, while 'were not significantly' is used when discussing the degree or extent of something. They are not interchangeable as they convey different meanings.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 782 views

were not significant

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the importance or relevance of something.

This phrase is used to indicate that something was not important or relevant in a particular context.

Examples:

The results of the study were not significant.
The differences between the two groups were not significant.

Show examples from the web [+]

However, as the exported quantities were not significant this cannot be considered representative.
However, the exported quantities were not significant and can thus not be considered representative.
It should however be noted that the investments made in the period considered were not significant.
The sampled producers' export volumes were not significant over the period considered, never representing more than 2 % of the produced volumes.
As a result, a 6,2 % profit margin was used for the calculation of the injury elimination level, as achieved in 2004 at a time when import quantities from the PRC were not significant and prices were above those of the CI.
Adjusted Odds Ratios for myopathy with the last statin (with or without gemfibrozil) compared to non-concurrent cerivastatin were not significant.
Imports from Malaysia have decreased substantially following the extension of measures and during the IP they were not significant.
It is noted that stock movements during the period considered were not significant and did not show a clear trend.
For the above reasons, it is considered that the two export sales transactions to the Community during the IP were not significant enough to constitute a representative basis for the assessment of existence of dumping.
Further, that company claimed that the distortions on the raw materials market were not significant because 17,5 % of the raw material is imported from unrelated international suppliers and the rest is mainly purchased from related companies.

Alternatives:

were not important
were not relevant
were not noteworthy
were not substantial
were not crucial

were not significantly

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when discussing the degree or extent of something.

This phrase is used to indicate that something did not reach a significant degree or extent in a particular context.

Examples:

The temperature change was not significantly different from yesterday.
The number of participants did not increase significantly.

Show examples from the web [+]

In two of the 12-week studies the percentage of patients with endoscopic gastroduodenal ulceration were not significantly different between placebo and celecoxib 200 mg BID and 400 mg BID.
The pharmacokinetics of a single dose of etoricoxib 120 mg in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency and patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis were not significantly different from those in healthy subjects.
The pharmacokinetics of aliskiren were not significantly affected in patients with mild to severe liver disease.
The pharmacokinetics of theophylline, a CYP1A2 substrate, were not significantly affected by co-administration with duloxetine (60 mg twice daily).
The rates of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction were not significantly different between the treatment groups.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between male and female patients.
The mean serum ferritin levels were not significantly different in the two treatment groups, but mean hepatic iron concentration in deferiprone treated patients seems to increase more than in deferoxamine treated patients.
The pharmacokinetics of theophylline, a CYP1A2 39 substrate, were not significantly affected by co-administration with duloxetine (60 mg twice daily).
Hepatic oxygen delivery and consumption were not significantly altered at concentrations up to 2.0 MAC.
Serum levels of LH, FSH and progesterone were not significantly affected.
Atazanavir and fluconazole concentrations were not significantly modified when REYATAZ/ ritonavir was co-administered with fluconazole.
In single dose studies in subjects with end stage renal failure, plasma concentrations of lamotrigine were not significantly altered.
Plasma pharmacokinetics and protein binding of gadofosveset were not significantly influenced by moderate hepatic impairment (Child Pugh B).
The mean elimination half-lives of loratadine and its metabolite were not significantly different from that observed in normal subjects.
The rates of confirmed lower GI clinical events (small or large bowel perforation, obstruction, or hemorrhage, (POBs)) were not significantly different between etoricoxib and diclofenac.
Concentrations of atazanavir were not significantly affected.
In this study the kinetics of toremifene in patients with impaired renal function were not significantly altered as compared to normal subjects.
Paracetamol AUC, Cmax and tmax were not significantly changed when paracetamol was given 1 hour before BYETTA injection.
No user cooperated in the investigation. This suggests that, although measures have been in place, users were not significantly affected by these measures.
Serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and progesterone were not significantly affected.

Alternatives:

were not markedly
were not substantially
were not considerably
were not noticeably
were not appreciably

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

were not significant vs were not significantly