⚡ Black Friday Offer: Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

we have three production lines vs we have 3 production lines

Both phrases are correct, but the second one is more commonly used in written English. Using numerals like '3' instead of spelling out the number 'three' is a common practice in technical or formal writing.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 623 views

we have three production lines

This phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is correct and can be used in both spoken and written English to indicate the number of production lines.
  • The polymerisation plant operated with three production lines, (CP1, CP2 and CP3). Of these, CP3 had been created in 2003.
  • We have three minutes, Agent Shaw.
  • The thing is, we have three guns.
  • People, we have three weddings to save.
  • We have three different fonts to choose from.
  • We have three schools, two movie theaters.
  • So we have three bar attorneys here for you today.
  • We have three minutes to vent the engines.
  • Dispatch said we have three incoming...
  • We have three testing centres which cover the five-mile radius.
  • We have three men robbing an armored truck.
  • We have three offers for our apartment.
  • We have three children, Dr. Yang...
  • As you know, we have three boys missing from Holiday Garden.
  • We have three more seals to break before the Rapture.
  • So far we have three views of the King's assailant.
  • We have three witnesses to the fact.
  • Shaw, we have three cars tailing us.
  • We have three dead because of him.
  • All right, gentlemen, we have three hostiles on the floor.

Alternatives:

  • we have three production lines
  • we have a total of three production lines

we have 3 production lines

This phrase is also correct and more commonly used in written English.

This phrase is correct and is often preferred in written English, especially in technical or formal contexts, to represent the number of production lines.
  • No time, we have 3 minutes.
  • We have 3 officers, one of them possibly injured, and one suspect.
  • So we have 3 months to pacify Turano's hill.
  • And we have 3 hours to rescue Carla.
  • We have 3 confirmed victims And 4 possibles.
  • We have 3 million unemployed in the European Union.
  • But we have 3 attack forces on the ground and only one at the landing zone.
  • It means we have 3 days to stop the Pacific plate from moving.
  • I'm talking about a thousand buildings, and we have 3 hours and 1 5 minutes to do it.
  • So if we have 3 inches of mulch it will hold 1 inch of water.
  • We have 3-6 moves scheduled, 3-8 moves completed.
  • So you're saying we have 3 potential suspects?
  • So we have 3 people who commit a brutal double homicide, then never act on it again?
  • Right, we have 3 men and 2 girls So what?
  • The production line is not impaired.
  • It's a business, a production line.
  • They are a starting a production line...
  • I vow that I will improve the production line.
  • That way it doesn't affect the production line.
  • From the catwalk, you could see the production line.

Alternatives:

  • we have three production lines
  • we have a total of three production lines

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

⚡️ Black Friday 2024 ⚡️

Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!