we have revised it vs we have revised

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'We have revised it' is used when referring to a specific object or document that has been revised, while 'We have revised' is used when the object being revised is implied or understood from the context.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 3644 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific object or document that has been revised.

"we have revised it"

This phrase is used when you want to specify the object or document that has been revised. 'It' refers to the specific item that has undergone revision.

Examples:

We have revised the report.
We have revised the contract.
We have revised the presentation slides.

Show examples from the web [+]

I regret that Mrs Roure's report is still stuck in the Council even though we have revised it.
We have a copyright directive dating from 1991; perhaps we should have revised it.
We have revised Directive 2001/18/EC about placing live GMOs on the market.
Inflation is higher than expected - we have revised our estimate for 2010 to 4 3/4 percent - pushed up by indirect tax increases.
That is why we have revised Directive 18/2001/EC to include better risk assessment and better information, so that consumers can make an informed choice.
Greece has revised its national account data, which in turn have been re-revised by Eurostat and the GNI Committee.
I revised it to an internal fixator.
In October the Council revised its Common Position on Burma.
In fact, I've already revised it.
In June 2003 the FATF revised its Recommendations also now covering terrorist financing.
We welcome the fact that the EIB has revised its policy on offshore financial centres.
On 10 May 2013, the Bank revised its offer.
New Zealand revised its rules on carton handling in meat in 2010.
New Zealand revised its meat inspection system for bovines and ovine and caprine in 2012.
Following initiation of the procedure, Belgium has considerably revised its presentation of the facts.
After an EP vote earlier this year, the Commission revised its proposal and it is this revised legislation that the Council approved in July.
I myself have revised my own views several times regarding the very nature of subsidiarity and, in particular, the need to clarify responsibilities.
Further positive developments include the fact that many Member States have revised their mental health strategies or are setting up action plans, for example, in Finland and Hungary.
I am pleased that the Council and the Commission have revised their original opinion and now also see this as a workable basis for future type approvals.
As regards participation in lifelong learning, there have been many breaks in time series: some countries have revised their data collection methods between 2002 and 2003.

Alternatives:

We have revised the document.
We have revised the file.
We have revised the manuscript.

This phrase is correct and commonly used when the object being revised is implied or understood from the context.

"we have revised "

This phrase is used when the object being revised is clear from the context or when it is not necessary to specify the object. The action of revising is the focus.

Examples:

We have revised our strategy.
We have revised our plans.
We have revised our approach.

Show examples from the web [+]

Inflation is higher than expected - we have revised our estimate for 2010 to 4 3/4 percent - pushed up by indirect tax increases.
I regret that Mrs Roure's report is still stuck in the Council even though we have revised it.
That is why we have revised Directive 18/2001/EC to include better risk assessment and better information, so that consumers can make an informed choice.
We have revised Directive 2001/18/EC about placing live GMOs on the market.
We have a copyright directive dating from 1991; perhaps we should have revised it.
As the Commissioner mentioned, we have a revised framework.
In other words, if our plan was to revise our financial perspective, then we should have revised the ultraliberal ideology underpinning it, but to question the three scourges of Anglo-Saxon thinking - Malthus, Adam Smith and Ricardo - was quite another matter.
Instead of revising the objectives downwards, we ought to have revised the intellectual as well as the financial means upwards.
Now that we have a revised proposal, we all should be prepared to sell it and to recognise that it is a major step forward.
In fact I hope tomorrow we can say we will have the revised Services Directive, to be approved by a parliamentary vote.
Here we are almost at the end of 2002 before we finally have a revised text.
We haven't gotten any revised instructions, ma'am.
Therefore, I should simply like to make a request to the Commission: now that we have a revised plan to simplify the formalities, as has been announced, I hope that Parliament will have a greater role in the debate and planning of these new initiatives.
We have also made a revised recommendation on interconnection pricing and now we have on-going enforcement measures and infringement proceedings, for example, against a number of Member States on carrier pre-selection and local tariff structures.
With the help of this Parliament and the Council, these things have been dealt with, put behind us, or turned around: we now have the financial perspectives; we now have the revised Stability and Growth Pact.
I myself have revised my own views several times regarding the very nature of subsidiarity and, in particular, the need to clarify responsibilities.
Further positive developments include the fact that many Member States have revised their mental health strategies or are setting up action plans, for example, in Finland and Hungary.
I am pleased that the Council and the Commission have revised their original opinion and now also see this as a workable basis for future type approvals.
As regards participation in lifelong learning, there have been many breaks in time series: some countries have revised their data collection methods between 2002 and 2003.
The Commission and the IMF have revised growth forecasts from above 3% to 2.8%.

Alternatives:

We have made revisions.
We have reviewed and revised.
We have updated.

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

we have revised it vs we have revised