"We have directly partnered with" vs "We are a technology alliance partner with"

Question

"We have directly partnered with" vs "We are a technology alliance partner with"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'We have directly partnered with' is used to emphasize a direct partnership, while 'we are a technology alliance partner with' is used to highlight the specific type of partnership as a technology alliance. The choice between the two depends on the emphasis you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to highlight a direct partnership between two entities without any intermediary. It emphasizes the direct nature of the partnership.

Examples:

We have directly partnered with the leading software provider to offer integrated solutions.
The company has directly partnered with local communities to support social initiatives.

Alternatives:

We have formed a direct partnership with
We have collaborated directly with
We have established a direct partnership with

This phrase is used to specify the type of partnership as a technology alliance. It highlights the focus on technology and the nature of the partnership.

Examples:

We are a technology alliance partner with industry leaders in cybersecurity.
The company is a technology alliance partner with key players in the automotive sector.

Alternatives:

We are a partner in a technology alliance with
We are part of a technology alliance with
We are aligned with a technology alliance as a partner

Answer 1

We have directly partnered with

This phrase is correct and commonly used to emphasize a direct partnership.

Answer 2

We are a technology alliance partner with

This phrase is correct and commonly used to specify a partnership as a technology alliance.

"We have directly partnered with" vs "We are a technology alliance partner with"

We have directly partnered with

We are a technology alliance partner with

Related Comparisons