"we have a limited number of people" vs "we have a limited number of staff"

Question

"we have a limited number of people" vs "we have a limited number of staff"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'We have a limited number of staff' implies a restriction on the number of employees available, while 'We have a limited number of people' is more general and could refer to any group of individuals. The choice between the two depends on whether you specifically want to refer to staff or just people in general.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is more general and can refer to any group of individuals, not just staff. It implies that there are only a certain number of people available.

Examples:

We have a limited number of people attending the event.
There is a limited number of people who can fit in the room.

Alternatives:

We have a restricted number of individuals
Our numbers are limited
We have a finite number of individuals
We are short on people
We have a small group

This phrase is used when referring to a specific group of employees or workers. It implies that there are only a certain number of staff members available.

Examples:

We have a limited number of staff, so we need to prioritize tasks.
Due to budget constraints, we have a limited number of staff this year.

Alternatives:

We have a restricted number of employees
Our staff numbers are limited
We have a finite number of employees
We are short-staffed
We have a small team

Answer 1

we have a limited number of people

This phrase is correct and can be used to indicate a restriction on the number of individuals in a general sense.

Answer 2

we have a limited number of staff

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate a restriction on the number of employees available.

"we have a limited number of people" vs "we have a limited number of staff"

we have a limited number of people

we have a limited number of staff

Related Comparisons