"We interviewed a candidate" vs "We had interviewed a candidate"

Question

"We interviewed a candidate" vs "We had interviewed a candidate"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'We had interviewed a candidate' is used when referring to a past action that occurred before another past action, while 'We interviewed a candidate' is used to simply state a past action. The choice between the two depends on the specific timeline you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is used to describe a past action of interviewing a candidate without specifying the exact timing in relation to other events. It is in simple past tense.

Examples:

We interviewed a candidate for the position yesterday.
They interviewed a candidate with excellent qualifications.

Alternatives:

We had interviewed a candidate
We conducted an interview with a candidate
We had already interviewed a candidate
We had finished interviewing a candidate
We had completed the candidate interview

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize that the action of interviewing the candidate happened before another past event. It indicates a past perfect tense.

Examples:

We had interviewed a candidate before making the final decision.
By the time we arrived, they had interviewed a candidate for the position.

Alternatives:

We interviewed a candidate
We had conducted an interview with a candidate
We had already interviewed a candidate
We had finished interviewing a candidate
We had completed the candidate interview

Answer 1

We interviewed a candidate

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to simply state a past action without emphasizing the sequence of events.

Answer 2

We had interviewed a candidate

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to a past action that occurred before another past action.

"We interviewed a candidate" vs "We had interviewed a candidate"

We interviewed a candidate

We had interviewed a candidate

Related Comparisons