TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

We do not have changes in the supplier vs do not have changes in the supplier

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. The first phrase 'we do not have changes in the supplier' is more specific and implies that 'we' are involved in the situation. The second phrase 'do not have changes in the supplier' is more general and can be used in a broader context.

Last updated: March 29, 2024 • 724 views

We do not have changes in the supplier

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. It implies that 'we' are involved in the situation regarding the supplier.

This phrase is used when referring to a specific group or entity (in this case, 'we') that does not have any changes in the supplier.
  • However, at that stage, a client contemplating a new change of supplier would have been free to select among all the suppliers active in the Spanish market.
  • reduce paperwork when consumers change supplier;
  • The right to change supplier free is one demand.
  • The Committee considers it important to communicate this principle much more effectively, because it may also be associated with changes in supplier and user structures in transport.
  • Changes in suppliers and production sites pertaining to licensed products shall be notified to competent bodies, together with supporting information to verify ongoing compliance with the license conditions.
  • Changes in suppliers and production sites pertaining to products to which the ecolabel has been granted shall be notified to Competent Bodies, together with supporting information to enable verification of continued compliance with the criteria.
  • Furthermore, these contracts are usually concluded for much shorter periods than the PPAs and therefore give buyers the option to change suppliers if better prices are offered by competitors.
  • The average number of service stations supplied by Repsol CPP in a position to change supplier would exceed 400 a year in the years ahead.
  • At present, only between 140 and 160 service stations supplied by Repsol CPP are in a position to change supplier each year.
  • Property owners in Sweden are not able to change suppliers despite the fact that it is technically possible for different producers to use the same distribution system.
  • In all cases the number must be activated by the new operator within one working day of the agreement to change supplier.
  • It should be possible to change supplier at any time of year, free of charge, without prejudice to one's rights.
  • It is important that consumers who wish to change supplier are not discouraged or hampered in any way from doing so.
  • When it is complicated and time-consuming for customers to change supplier, this can have a negative effect on their willingness to switch.
  • On the other hand, only less than 1 % of the customers have so far decided to change supplier.
  • The investigation revealed that for some users the suppliers of sulphanilic acid need to undergo stringent and costly certification/verification process which makes changes from one supplier to another more difficult.
  • In the case of composite foods, the rapporteur is aware of the implications for the industries concerned, in particular the need to modify packaging regularly to take account of changes in suppliers.
  • Limits should also be placed on the formalities arising from a change in supplier; consumers should be protected against dishonest sales practices and consumer organisations should be set up.
  • Therefore, to change supplier in order to avoid paying duties would be costly, impossible in the short term and risky from a technological point of view.
  • First of all, the offer makes it possible to increase considerably the number of service stations currently supplied by Repsol CPP which would be in a position to change supplier.

Alternatives:

  • We have not experienced any changes in the supplier.
  • There have been no changes in the supplier for us.

do not have changes in the supplier

This phrase is correct and can be used in a general context. It does not specify any particular group or entity.

This phrase is more general and can be used when discussing changes in the supplier without specifying a particular group or entity.
  • However, at that stage, a client contemplating a new change of supplier would have been free to select among all the suppliers active in the Spanish market.
  • reduce paperwork when consumers change supplier;
  • The right to change supplier free is one demand.
  • The Committee considers it important to communicate this principle much more effectively, because it may also be associated with changes in supplier and user structures in transport.
  • Changes in suppliers and production sites pertaining to licensed products shall be notified to competent bodies, together with supporting information to verify ongoing compliance with the license conditions.
  • Changes in suppliers and production sites pertaining to products to which the ecolabel has been granted shall be notified to Competent Bodies, together with supporting information to enable verification of continued compliance with the criteria.
  • Furthermore, these contracts are usually concluded for much shorter periods than the PPAs and therefore give buyers the option to change suppliers if better prices are offered by competitors.
  • The average number of service stations supplied by Repsol CPP in a position to change supplier would exceed 400 a year in the years ahead.
  • At present, only between 140 and 160 service stations supplied by Repsol CPP are in a position to change supplier each year.
  • Property owners in Sweden are not able to change suppliers despite the fact that it is technically possible for different producers to use the same distribution system.
  • In all cases the number must be activated by the new operator within one working day of the agreement to change supplier.
  • It should be possible to change supplier at any time of year, free of charge, without prejudice to one's rights.
  • It is important that consumers who wish to change supplier are not discouraged or hampered in any way from doing so.
  • When it is complicated and time-consuming for customers to change supplier, this can have a negative effect on their willingness to switch.
  • On the other hand, only less than 1 % of the customers have so far decided to change supplier.
  • The investigation revealed that for some users the suppliers of sulphanilic acid need to undergo stringent and costly certification/verification process which makes changes from one supplier to another more difficult.
  • In the case of composite foods, the rapporteur is aware of the implications for the industries concerned, in particular the need to modify packaging regularly to take account of changes in suppliers.
  • Limits should also be placed on the formalities arising from a change in supplier; consumers should be protected against dishonest sales practices and consumer organisations should be set up.
  • Therefore, to change supplier in order to avoid paying duties would be costly, impossible in the short term and risky from a technological point of view.
  • First of all, the offer makes it possible to increase considerably the number of service stations currently supplied by Repsol CPP which would be in a position to change supplier.

Alternatives:

  • There are no changes in the supplier.
  • Changes in the supplier are not present.

Related Comparisons

i do not have a question vs i do not have the question they do not have a lot experience vs they do not have a lot of experience do not have the freedom of applying vs do not have the freedom in applying we do not have an update when vs we do not have an update that when combination of practical factors vs we did not consider in the analysis We do not have classes anymore vs We do not have classes

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!