"we are targeting at least 30 attendees" vs "we are targeting a minimum number of 30 attendees"

Question

"we are targeting at least 30 attendees" vs "we are targeting a minimum number of 30 attendees"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'We are targeting a minimum number of 30 attendees' implies that 30 is the lowest acceptable number, while 'We are targeting at least 30 attendees' suggests that 30 is the baseline goal. The choice between them depends on the specific context and the emphasis you want to give to the number 30.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

This phrase is appropriate when you want to convey that 30 is the minimum number of attendees expected, but more are welcome.

Alternatives:

we are aiming for at least 30 attendees
we expect at least 30 attendees
we require at least 30 attendees
we need at least 30 attendees
we must have at least 30 attendees

This phrase is suitable when you want to stress that 30 is the least number of attendees that is acceptable or required.

Alternatives:

we are aiming for a minimum of 30 attendees
we are expecting a minimum of 30 attendees
we require a minimum of 30 attendees
we need a minimum of 30 attendees
we must have a minimum of 30 attendees

Answer 1

we are targeting at least 30 attendees

This phrase is correct and is commonly used to indicate that 30 is the baseline goal.

Answer 2

we are targeting a minimum number of 30 attendees

This phrase is correct and can be used when emphasizing that 30 is the lowest acceptable number.

"we are targeting at least 30 attendees" vs "we are targeting a minimum number of 30 attendees"

we are targeting at least 30 attendees

we are targeting a minimum number of 30 attendees

Related Comparisons