"was unusual FOR me" vs "was unusual to me"

Question

"was unusual FOR me" vs "was unusual to me"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Was unusual to me' is used when something is unfamiliar or strange to the speaker, while 'was unusual for me' is used when something is not typical or common for the speaker.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used when something is not typical or common for the speaker. It indicates that the speaker found the situation or experience uncommon in their personal experience.

Examples:

It was unusual for me to be the center of attention.
Her behavior was unusual for me to witness.
The weather in that region was unusual for me.

Alternatives:

was uncommon for me
was not typical for me
was out of the ordinary for me
was unexpected for me
was not my usual experience

This phrase is used when something is unfamiliar or strange to the speaker. It indicates that the speaker found the situation or experience out of the ordinary.

Examples:

The food at the new restaurant was unusual to me.
The customs in that country were unusual to me.
The language they were speaking was unusual to me.

Alternatives:

seemed strange to me
felt unfamiliar to me
was out of the ordinary for me
was different from what I expected
was not what I was used to

Answer 1

was unusual FOR me

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

was unusual to me

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"was unusual FOR me" vs "was unusual to me"

was unusual FOR me

was unusual to me

Related Comparisons