"was there for a shoot" vs "was there on a shoot"

Question

"was there for a shoot" vs "was there on a shoot"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Was there on a shoot' implies that the person was physically present at the location where a shoot was taking place. 'Was there for a shoot' suggests that the person was present at the location for the purpose of participating in or being involved with the shoot.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to show that someone was at a location specifically for the purpose of participating in or being involved with a shoot.

Examples:

She was there for a shoot for a commercial.
He was there for a shoot for a music video.
They were there for a shoot for a documentary.

Alternatives:

was present for a shoot
was at the shoot location for a shoot
was involved in a shoot at the location

This phrase is used to indicate that someone was physically present at the location where a shoot was happening.

Examples:

I was there on a shoot last week.
She was there on a shoot for a fashion magazine.
He was there on a shoot for a movie.

Alternatives:

was present at a shoot
was on set for a shoot
was at the shoot location

Answer 1

was there for a shoot

This phrase is correct and is commonly used to indicate being present at a location for the purpose of a shoot.

Answer 2

was there on a shoot

This phrase is correct and can be used when referring to being physically present at a location where a shoot is taking place.

"was there for a shoot" vs "was there on a shoot"

was there for a shoot

was there on a shoot

Related Comparisons