"was the path for me" vs "was the right path for me"

Question

"was the path for me" vs "was the right path for me"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'Was the right path for me' implies that the path taken was the correct one, while 'Was the path for me' simply states that a path was taken without specifying if it was the right one.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

This phrase is used to simply state that a particular path or decision was taken by the speaker, without emphasizing whether it was the correct choice or not.

Examples:

Joining that club was the path for me.
Moving to a new city was the path for me.
Choosing that career was the path for me.
Studying that subject was the path for me.
Traveling to that country was the path for me.

Alternatives:

was the chosen path for me
was the selected path for me
was the decided path for me
was the taken path for me
was the followed path for me

This phrase is used to express that a particular path or decision was the correct one for the speaker. It emphasizes the idea of making the right choice.

Examples:

Choosing to study abroad was the right path for me.
Starting my own business was the right path for me.
Deciding to pursue a career in music was the right path for me.
Joining that club was the right path for me.
Moving to a new city was the right path for me.

Alternatives:

was the correct path for me
was the best path for me
was the optimal path for me
was the ideal path for me
was the perfect path for me

Answer 1

was the path for me

This phrase is correct and can be used to indicate that a specific path was taken by the speaker without specifying if it was the right one.

Answer 2

was the right path for me

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that a specific path was the correct choice for the speaker.

"was the path for me" vs "was the right path for me"

was the path for me

was the right path for me

Related Comparisons