was set to vs was set at

Both "was set to" and "was set at" are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. "Was set to" is commonly used when referring to a specific value or state that something was adjusted to, while "was set at" is often used when indicating a fixed position or level. The choice between the two depends on the specific situation and what is being described.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 3787 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

" was set to"

This phrase is used when referring to a specific value or state that something was adjusted to. It indicates a change or adjustment to a particular setting or condition.

Examples:

The temperature was set to 75 degrees Fahrenheit.
The alarm was set to go off at 7 a.m.
The deadline was set to next Friday.
The device was set to silent mode.
The goal was set to increase sales by 20%.

Alternatives:

was adjusted to
was changed to
was fixed at
was established as
was designated as

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"was set at"

This phrase is often used when indicating a fixed position or level. It is commonly used to describe a specific point or level that is established or defined.

Examples:

The price was set at $100.
The meeting was set at the conference room.
The speed limit was set at 55 miles per hour.
The interest rate was set at 3%.
The volume was set at maximum.

Show examples from the web [+]

The marginal interest rate was set at 5.36 %.
The deadline for reply was set at 25 July 2013.
The subscription price was set at EUR 0,66 per share.
However, the ICES advice for the 2007 TAC was set at 15,000 tonnes.
His bail was set at a million.
1.3 The EUSF budget for the 2002-2006 period was set at around EUR one billion per year.
His bail was set at half a million.
In this review report the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for kresoxim methyl was set at 0,4 mg/kg of body weight.
In this review report the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for spiroxamine was set at 0,025 mg/kg bw/day.
On the basis of the information available, this profit was set at around 10 %.
The annual quota was set at 6.593,479 points for 2004 with reductions of 5% successively in 2005 and 2006.
Lastly, in April 2006, following negotiations between the Council and the European Parliament, the definitive proposal was set at EUR 864316 million, or 1,048 % of GNI.
The financial framework for Fiscalis for the period from 2003 to 2007 was set at 67,3 million euro.
As indicated above, it was set at 33,5 % of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the products manufactured by Usha Martin Limited (UML) was set at 23,8 %.
The limit was set at 200 BSE cases per million adult animals in the population, for countries carrying out active surveillance.
In 2000, in the first year of the 2000-2005 period, its rateable value was set at GBP 493 million.
This rate was set at 9,5 % as it reflected a benchmarking with similar private operators in the trade.
Interest on this additional principal was set at 6 %, to be paid quarterly.
The interest rate applicable to the first main refinancing operation, offered in the form of a fixed rate tender, was set at a level of 3.0%.

Alternatives:

was established at
was defined as
was placed at
was positioned at
was located at

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

was set to vs was set at

" was set to"

"was set at"

Related Comparisons

2. Submit Your Text

3. Receive Your Polished Text