"was of poor quality" vs "was of a poor quality"

Question

"was of poor quality" vs "was of a poor quality"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Was of poor quality' is more commonly used when describing a specific item or product, while 'was of a poor quality' is used when referring to a general characteristic or attribute. The choice between the two depends on the context in which they are used.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

This phrase is used to describe the poor quality of a specific item or product. It indicates that the quality of the item is not good.

Examples:

The shirt I bought was of poor quality.
The food served at the restaurant was of poor quality.
The movie received negative reviews because it was of poor quality.

Alternatives:

was of low quality
was of substandard quality
was of inferior quality
was poorly made
was shoddy

This phrase is used to describe a general characteristic or attribute of poor quality. It is not specific to a particular item or product.

Examples:

The company's products were of a poor quality.
The school's facilities were of a poor quality.
The neighborhood had houses of a poor quality.

Alternatives:

had poor quality
possessed poor quality
exhibited poor quality
showed poor quality
displayed poor quality

Answer 1

was of poor quality

This phrase is correct and commonly used when describing a specific item or product.

Answer 2

was of a poor quality

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a general characteristic or attribute.

"was of poor quality" vs "was of a poor quality"

was of poor quality

was of a poor quality

Related Comparisons