"was not armed" vs "is not armed"

Question

"was not armed" vs "is not armed"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Was not armed' is used to describe a past situation where someone was not carrying a weapon, while 'is not armed' is used to describe a current situation where someone is not carrying a weapon.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone did not have a weapon in the past.

Examples:

He was not armed during the robbery.
The suspect was not armed when the police arrived.

Alternatives:

did not have a weapon
was unarmed
was not carrying a weapon
was without a weapon
was defenseless

This phrase is used to indicate that someone does not have a weapon currently.

Examples:

He is not armed at the moment.
The security guard is not armed.

Alternatives:

does not have a weapon
is unarmed
is not carrying a weapon
is without a weapon
is defenseless

Answer 1

was not armed

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe a past situation where someone was not carrying a weapon.

Answer 2

is not armed

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe a current situation where someone is not carrying a weapon.

"was not armed" vs "is not armed"

was not armed

is not armed

Related Comparisons