1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"was low-priced but not cheap" vs "was inexpensive but not cheap"

Both phrases are correct and convey a similar meaning. They both express that something was affordable but not of low quality. The choice between 'inexpensive' and 'low-priced' depends on personal preference or the specific context in which the phrase is used.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

was low-priced but not cheap

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to convey that something was affordable but not of low quality.

This phrase is used to describe something that was reasonably priced but still of good quality or value.

Examples:

  • The hotel was low-priced but not cheap, providing comfortable accommodations at a reasonable cost.
  • The restaurant offered food that was low-priced but not cheap in taste.
  • The store sold items that were low-priced but not cheaply made.
  • The car was low-priced but not cheap, offering good features for the price.
  • The phone was low-priced but not cheaply constructed.

Alternatives:

  • was affordable but not cheap
  • was reasonably priced but not cheap
  • was cost-effective but not cheap
  • was budget-friendly but not cheap
  • was a good value but not cheap

was inexpensive but not cheap

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to convey that something was affordable but not of low quality.

This phrase is used to describe something that was reasonably priced but still of good quality or value.

Examples:

  • The hotel was inexpensive but not cheap, offering great amenities at a reasonable price.
  • The restaurant served food that was inexpensive but not cheap in quality.
  • The clothing store sold items that were inexpensive but not cheaply made.
  • The car was inexpensive but not cheap, providing good value for the price.
  • The phone was inexpensive but not cheaply constructed.

Alternatives:

  • was affordable but not cheap
  • was reasonably priced but not cheap
  • was cost-effective but not cheap
  • was budget-friendly but not cheap
  • was a good value but not cheap

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!