"was held" vs "was holden"

Question

"was held" vs "was holden"

Both "was holden" and "was held" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Was held" is the more common and modern form, while "was holden" is an archaic or poetic form that is rarely used in contemporary English.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is the standard past tense form of "hold." It is used in everyday language and writing to indicate that something was kept or contained in the past.

Alternatives:

was holden

This phrase is an archaic or poetic form of "was held." It can be used in literature, poetry, or historical contexts to give a more old-fashioned or formal tone.

Alternatives:

was held

Answer 1

was held

This is the more common and modern form of the phrase.

Answer 2

was holden

This is a correct but archaic or poetic form that is rarely used in contemporary English.

"was held" vs "was holden"

was held

was holden

Related Comparisons