"was entitled to be" vs "was entitled to being"

Question

"was entitled to be" vs "was entitled to being"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Was entitled to being' is used when emphasizing the state or condition of entitlement, while 'was entitled to be' is used when referring to the action or result of entitlement. It's important to choose the correct phrase based on the context of the sentence.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to the action or result of entitlement. It is commonly used in everyday language.

Examples:

He was entitled to be happy.
She was entitled to be compensated for her work.
The students were entitled to be heard.

Alternatives:

was entitled to have
was entitled to receive
was entitled to expect
was entitled to demand
was entitled to enjoy

This phrase is used to emphasize the state or condition of entitlement. It is often used in formal or legal contexts.

Examples:

He was entitled to being treated with respect.
She was entitled to being informed of the decision.
The employee was entitled to being paid for the overtime work.

Alternatives:

was entitled to receive
was entitled to have
was entitled to enjoy
was entitled to expect
was entitled to demand

Answer 1

was entitled to be

This phrase is correct and is used when referring to the action or result of entitlement.

Answer 2

was entitled to being

This phrase is correct and can be used when emphasizing the state or condition of entitlement.

"was entitled to be" vs "was entitled to being"

was entitled to be

was entitled to being

Related Comparisons