was due to a low regression coefficient vs was due to a low efficiency

Both phrases are correct, but they convey different meanings. 'Was due to a low regression coefficient' implies that the reason for something is related to a low regression coefficient, while 'was due to a low efficiency' suggests that the reason is linked to a lack of efficiency. The choice between the two depends on the specific context and what aspect you want to emphasize.

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 770 views

was due to a low regression coefficient

This phrase is correct and commonly used in the context of statistical analysis or regression modeling.

This phrase is used to explain that the reason for something is related to a low regression coefficient, which is a statistical measure of the relationship between variables.

Examples:

The poor predictive performance of the model was due to a low regression coefficient for the key variable.

Alternatives:

The reason for this outcome was a low regression coefficient.

was due to a low efficiency

This phrase is correct and can be used to explain that the reason for something is a lack of efficiency.

This phrase is suitable when attributing a cause to a situation where efficiency is lacking or suboptimal.

Examples:

The delay in project completion was due to a low efficiency in resource allocation.

Show examples from the web [+]

was due to a low efficiency of immunoprecipitation, identical results were also obtained by repetitive rounds of immuno- precipitation. Further, alterations of the ...
Sep 10, 2008 ... It remains unknown whether this low replication was due to a low efficiency of RNA capping, a low rate of transfection, or a unique property of ...
Jan 17, 2006 ... The choice of a different strain for this experiment was due to a low efficiency of both protoplast transformation, electroporation and conjugation ...
Mar 30, 2009 ... The reduced seed number phenotype in silenced plants was due to a low efficiency of self-fertilization; however, neither pollen nor ovule ...

Alternatives:

The reason for this issue was a lack of efficiency.

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

was due to a low regression coefficient vs was due to a low efficiency