"was diagnosed" vs "have been diagnosed"

Question

"was diagnosed" vs "have been diagnosed"

Both "was diagnosed" and "have been diagnosed" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Was diagnosed" is used when referring to a specific past event, while "have been diagnosed" is used when talking about a recent diagnosis that still has relevance to the present.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

This phrase is used to talk about a diagnosis that happened in the past. It indicates a single event that occurred at a specific point in time.

Examples:

He was diagnosed with cancer last year.
She was diagnosed with a rare disease in her childhood.

Alternatives:

had been diagnosed
received a diagnosis

This phrase is used to talk about a diagnosis that happened recently and is still relevant. It indicates a connection between the past diagnosis and the present situation.

Examples:

I have been diagnosed with a food allergy.
They have been diagnosed with COVID-19.

Alternatives:

have received a diagnosis
have been told by the doctor

Answer 1

was diagnosed

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a specific past event of being diagnosed with an illness or condition.

Answer 2

have been diagnosed

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a recent diagnosis that still has relevance to the present.

"was diagnosed" vs "have been diagnosed"

was diagnosed

have been diagnosed

Related Comparisons