was confirmed from the results vs was confirmed by the results

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Was confirmed by the results' is more commonly used and indicates that the results themselves provided the confirmation. On the other hand, 'was confirmed from the results' can also be used, but it suggests that the confirmation came directly from the results.

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 1413 views

was confirmed from the results

This phrase is correct but less commonly used than 'was confirmed by the results'. It suggests that the confirmation came directly from the results.

This phrase can be used to indicate that the confirmation was derived directly from the results themselves.

Show examples from the web [+]

The autophagy was confirmed from the results of transmission electron microscopy and light microscopy as well as with confocal microscopy. It is tempting to ...
... in 31 cases (91 per cent) the existence of arterial obstruction of the upper limb was confirmed. From the results of arteriographic study in 78 arms, the primary ...
It was confirmed from the results that ΔJ should be used instead of ΔK to evaluate the crack growth. Next, crack growth tests were performed with cyclic loads.
Nov 24, 2000 ... ... serine, cysteine, threonine, proline, and valine) (2), a hypothesis that was confirmed from the results of a complete set of altered iso-1 having ...

Alternatives:

was confirmed by the results
confirmation was derived from the results
confirmation came from the results
confirmation was based on the results
confirmation was supported by the results

was confirmed by the results

This phrase is correct and more commonly used than 'was confirmed from the results'. It indicates that the results themselves provided the confirmation.

This phrase is commonly used to indicate that the confirmation was provided by the results.

Show examples from the web [+]

This was confirmed by the results of multiple logistic regression analysis including established risk factors (chi(2) =4.65, p=0.311). In conclusion, the results ...
This was confirmed by the results of multiple logistic regression analysis including established risk factors (χ2. =4.65, p=0.311). In conclusion, the results indicate ...
The main idea tested in the French experiments on cows was confirmed by the results. Which main idea could have been tested in the French experiment?
This prediction was confirmed by the results of the experiment illustrated in Figure 2. All groups were twice exposed to CS for 5 min, separated by a 4-h interval: ...

Alternatives:

was confirmed from the results
confirmation was provided by the results
confirmation was shown by the results
confirmation was evident from the results
confirmation was supported by the results

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

was confirmed from the results vs was confirmed by the results