"war-torn regions" vs "war-torn zones"

Question

"war-torn regions" vs "war-torn zones"

Both 'war-torn zones' and 'war-torn regions' are correct and commonly used phrases in English. They are interchangeable and can be used to describe areas that have been heavily affected by war.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to refer to broader geographical areas or territories that have been devastated by war.

Examples:

The international community pledged support for the war-torn regions in the aftermath of the conflict.
The peacekeeping mission was deployed to stabilize the war-torn regions.
Efforts were made to bring peace and stability to the war-torn regions.
Reconstruction projects were initiated in the war-torn regions.
The impact of the war was felt across the war-torn regions.

Alternatives:

conflict-ridden areas
post-conflict territories
battle-affected regions
war-affected zones
combat-devastated areas

This phrase is used to refer to specific areas or locations that have experienced the devastating effects of war.

Examples:

The humanitarian aid was urgently needed in the war-torn zones of the country.
Journalists risked their lives to report from the war-torn zones.
Many refugees fled from the war-torn zones seeking safety and shelter.
The organization provided support to the war-torn zones affected by conflict.
Rebuilding efforts were underway in the war-torn zones.

Alternatives:

conflict-affected areas
post-war regions
battle-scarred territories
war-ravaged zones
combat-devastated regions

Answer 1

war-torn regions

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe areas heavily affected by war.

Answer 2

war-torn zones

This phrase is correct and commonly used to describe areas heavily affected by war.

"war-torn regions" vs "war-torn zones"

war-torn regions

war-torn zones

Related Comparisons