1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"violence strikes" vs "violence striked"

The phrase 'violence strikes' is correct, while 'violence striked' is incorrect. 'Violence strikes' is the present simple tense, which is used to describe actions that happen regularly or facts. On the other hand, 'violence striked' is a grammatically incorrect form of the past tense. It's important to use the correct verb tense to convey the intended meaning accurately.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

violence strikes

'Violence strikes' is correct. It is in the present simple tense, used to describe actions that happen regularly or facts.

Use 'violence strikes' to talk about the ongoing or habitual occurrence of violence.

violence striked

'Violence striked' is incorrect. The past tense of 'strike' is 'struck,' not 'striked.'

The correct past tense form is 'violence struck.'

Alternatives:

  • violence struck

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!