TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

under peer review vs in peer review

Both "under peer review" and "in peer review" are commonly used phrases in the context of academic publishing. They are interchangeable and convey the same meaning. The choice between the two is a matter of personal preference or style.

Last updated: March 24, 2024 • 1456 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in academic contexts to indicate that a manuscript or research is currently being evaluated by peers.

"under peer review"

This phrase is used to describe the status of a manuscript or research article that is currently being evaluated by experts in the field before publication.

Examples:

  • The paper is currently under peer review.
  • The study has been submitted and is now under peer review.
  • I think his department should be under peer review.
  • Depending on whether a substance is already under peer review or not, for certain aspects of the procedure, different provisions should apply.
  • In the past, self-assessments have been carried out in Member States in close connection with international peer reviews under the auspices of the IAEA as International Regulatory Review Team or Integrated Regulatory Review Service missions.
  • As regards the peer review under the auspices of the Council, the European Union will send an expert mission to Bulgaria as soon as possible, before the conclusion of the accession negotiations.
  • The use of the handbook should be considered as a significant element in the assessment of the convergence of supervisory practices and for the peer review under Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
  • Under evidence code 1157, peer review conference transcripts are inadmissible.
  • The scope of such peer reviews shall include corporate governance practices under paragraph 7a.
  • Such peer reviews shall include inter-alia corporate governance practices under paragraph 7a.
  • The peer review evaluation process for the second stage follows the sequence described under 3.1.6.1.
  • Moreover, additional reporting requirements should be established under this Directive in relation to the findings of the topical peer reviews of nuclear installations.
  • In order to improve cooperation and transparency, carry out peer reviews of supervisors on a regular basis under the leadership of the EBA building on prior self-assessment.
  • Under my guidance and in collaboration with key stakeholders, the Treasury cooperated with an OECD-SIGMA peer review team of senior independent expert practitioners from other EU Member States.
  • This section addresses the way in which independent experts are appointed by the ERCEA to assist in the peer review evaluation of proposals submitted under the Ideas Specific Programme.
  • This cycle of peer reviews has been finalised meanwhile and decisions or directives on the last substances are currently under preparation.
  • I must draw your attention to the fact that such peer reviews are usually carried out under the third pillar but not within Community law.
  • ESMA should also conduct peer reviews covering the activities of the competent authorities under this Regulation within an appropriate time-frame and in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
  • In order to ensure the effectiveness of the peer review process conducted under this Decision, it is appropriate for the Cooperation Network to provide guidance to the Member States.
  • The recommendations of the peer review obtained political consent and support by the Government and are being effected in a long-term strategic plan under my guidance, coordination and supervision.
  • Under my responsibility the Netherlands Court of Audit has also participated in an international peer review of the Office of the Auditor General in Canada.
  • In order to improve cooperation and transparency, carry out peer reviews of supervisors on a regular basis under the leadership of the EBA building on prior self-assessment.

Alternatives:

  • in peer review
  • being peer reviewed
  • going through peer review
  • under review by peers

This phrase is correct and commonly used in academic contexts to indicate that a manuscript or research is currently being evaluated by peers.

"in peer review"

This phrase is used to describe the status of a manuscript or research article that is currently being evaluated by experts in the field before publication.

Examples:

  • The paper is currently in peer review.
  • The study has been submitted and is now in peer review.
  • Carbon dating results don't get published in peer review journals.
  • As a doctor I know that advances in medicine are often achieved only after rigorous scrutiny and challenge in peer review journals.
  • Calls on the Commission to increase the number of women involved in peer review exercises, since this will familiarise women with Union procedures and programmes and encourage direct applications from them;
  • Since accreditation bodies must actively demonstrate that the trust they enjoy is well placed, the EESC thinks they should have to prove that they participate successfully in peer review.
  • Experts shall not participate in peer reviews in the Member State where they are employed.
  • Experts shall not participate in peer reviews in the Member State where they are employed.
  • The Commission must ensure that social partners and other relevant civil society organisations are involved in peer reviews.
  • The exchange can take place in peer reviews with a limited number of participants focusing on a specific theme, or in conferences with wider discussions.
  • Reciprocal trust should prevail in peer reviews, and it would therefore be appropriate for the Commission, whenever practicable, to inform Member States when it intends to use the results of peer review reports in its policy documents.
  • The EESC believes that, since accreditation bodies have to show that the confidence placed in them is well-founded, they should have to prove that they participate successfully in peer reviews.
  • participate, on a voluntary basis, in peer reviews on the assessment of risk management capability.
  • Peer reviews and the exchange of good practice are helpful instruments because they are concrete and inspire those involved. The Commission must ensure that social partners and other relevant civil society organisations are involved in peer reviews.
  • It is quite fantastic that they are lining up standards to get through this screening in the peer review process.
  • Any Member States intending to take part in the peer review shall inform the Cooperation Network within 1 month.
  • This section addresses the way in which independent experts are appointed by the ERCEA to assist in the peer review evaluation of proposals submitted under the Ideas Specific Programme.
  • I would add that the European Union is very interested in the peer review process within the G20.
  • The full report on this trial was published in the international peer review journal British Medical Journal.
  • Countries that participated in this peer review were Croatia, the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the United Kingdom and Serbia.
  • They are not permitted to divulge details of the proposals, the independent experts assigned to examining the proposals, nor the discussions in the peer review evaluation Panels.
  • The observers are also encouraged to enter into informal discussions with the ERCEA officials involved in the peer review evaluation sessions and to make observations on any possible improvements that could be put into practice immediately.

Alternatives:

  • under peer review
  • being peer reviewed
  • going through peer review
  • under review by peers

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo