two frequency bands vs work frequency bands

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Two frequency bands' is used when referring to the number of bands, while 'work frequency bands' is used when describing the purpose or function of the bands.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 609 views

two frequency bands

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the number of bands.

This phrase is used to indicate that there are two separate frequency bands. It is a clear and concise way to convey this information.

Examples:

The device operates on two frequency bands.
The system can detect signals in two frequency bands.
There are two frequency bands allocated for communication purposes.

Show examples from the web [+]

The frequency band 5-200 Hz shall be covered in each of the two senses in 15 minutes.
Member States must allow the usage of adjacent frequency bands within this table as a single frequency band provided the specific conditions of each of these adjacent frequency bands are met.
Member States must allow the usage of adjacent frequency bands within this table as a single frequency band provided the specific conditions of each of these adjacent frequency bands are met.
Member States must allow adjacent frequency bands within this table to be used as a single frequency band provided the specific conditions of each of these adjacent frequency bands are met.
Commission Decision 2005/928/EC [2] harmonises the 169,4-169,8125 MHz frequency band in the Community.
The services provided in this frequency band should mainly target end-user access to broadband communications.
Firstly, the effective use of frequency bands - this is also important for the nationwide development of broadband supply.
The most important frequency bands for satellite communications are:
Frequency bands for mobile communications *I
Those networks use the 790-862 MHz frequency band.
Frequency bands for mobile communications *I
It should be expressed as a value in dB/m for each one-third octave frequency band.
Commission Decision 2005/928/EC harmonises the 169,4-169,8125 MHz frequency band in the Community.
Increase deflector modulation to upper frequency band.
In accordance with Decision 2007/98/EC, complementary ground components use the same frequency bands as MSS (1980 to 2010 MHz and 2170 to 2200 MHz).
This is without prejudice to the use of the 2 GHz frequency band by systems other than those providing MSS in accordance with Decision 2007/98/EC.
Member States shall designate and make available as from 1 July 2007 the frequency bands 1980 to 2010 MHz and 2170 to 2200 MHz for systems providing mobile satellite services.
While the request seeks a minimum of protection for military equipment, it does not impose unnecessary restraints in terms of frequency band or geographical coverage.
For this frequency band Member States must make all the alternative sets of usage conditions possible.
on the harmonisation of the 169,4-169,8125 MHz frequency band in the Community

Alternatives:

a pair of frequency bands
two separate frequency bands
two distinct frequency bands
two different frequency bands
two specific frequency bands

work frequency bands

This phrase is correct and commonly used when describing the purpose or function of the frequency bands.

This phrase is used to specify that the frequency bands are used for work-related activities or functions. It provides clarity on the intended use of the bands.

Examples:

These are the work frequency bands used for communication.
The device operates on specific work frequency bands.
The system is designed to operate within work frequency bands.

Show examples from the web [+]

Member States must allow the usage of adjacent frequency bands within this table as a single frequency band provided the specific conditions of each of these adjacent frequency bands are met.
Member States must allow the usage of adjacent frequency bands within this table as a single frequency band provided the specific conditions of each of these adjacent frequency bands are met.
Member States must allow adjacent frequency bands within this table to be used as a single frequency band provided the specific conditions of each of these adjacent frequency bands are met.
Commission Decision 2005/928/EC [2] harmonises the 169,4-169,8125 MHz frequency band in the Community.
The services provided in this frequency band should mainly target end-user access to broadband communications.
Firstly, the effective use of frequency bands - this is also important for the nationwide development of broadband supply.
The most important frequency bands for satellite communications are:
Frequency bands for mobile communications *I
Those networks use the 790-862 MHz frequency band.
Frequency bands for mobile communications *I
It should be expressed as a value in dB/m for each one-third octave frequency band.
Commission Decision 2005/928/EC harmonises the 169,4-169,8125 MHz frequency band in the Community.
Increase deflector modulation to upper frequency band.
The frequency band 5-200 Hz shall be covered in each of the two senses in 15 minutes.
In accordance with Decision 2007/98/EC, complementary ground components use the same frequency bands as MSS (1980 to 2010 MHz and 2170 to 2200 MHz).
This is without prejudice to the use of the 2 GHz frequency band by systems other than those providing MSS in accordance with Decision 2007/98/EC.
Member States shall designate and make available as from 1 July 2007 the frequency bands 1980 to 2010 MHz and 2170 to 2200 MHz for systems providing mobile satellite services.
While the request seeks a minimum of protection for military equipment, it does not impose unnecessary restraints in terms of frequency band or geographical coverage.
For this frequency band Member States must make all the alternative sets of usage conditions possible.
on the harmonisation of the 169,4-169,8125 MHz frequency band in the Community

Alternatives:

operational frequency bands
functional frequency bands
task-related frequency bands
job-specific frequency bands
professional frequency bands

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

two frequency bands vs work frequency bands