⚡ Black Friday Offer: Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

trigger intent reasoning on respondents vs trigger in depth reasoning on respondents

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Trigger intent reasoning on respondents' implies activating a specific type of reasoning in respondents, while 'trigger in-depth reasoning on respondents' suggests prompting respondents to engage in thorough or detailed reasoning. The choice between the two depends on the specific type of reasoning you want to emphasize.

Last updated: April 01, 2024 • 407 views

trigger intent reasoning on respondents

This phrase is correct and can be used to indicate activating a specific type of reasoning in respondents.

This phrase is used when you want to specify that a particular kind of reasoning, related to intent, is being triggered in respondents.
  • Cost associated with the collection and production of a statistical product and burden on respondents.
  • 1. The collection of data shall be based where possible on available sources, minimising the burden on respondents.
  • Administrative data sources may be used to reduce the burden on respondents.
  • It also aims at reducing the burden on respondents.
  • The collection of data will not impose any additional burden on respondents.
  • For administrative sources, the burden on respondents resulting from additional questions for statistical purposes should be evaluated.
  • The group-level resolution authority shall provide reasoning on:
  • I don't believe that reasoning on the undervalued power of intelligence can offer any miraculous solutions.
  • All my reasoning on whether to leave or not came in a flash.
  • All this necessarily leads to reasoning on the basis of different methodologies within the same company.
  • The aim of reducing the burden on respondents and the national statistical institutes should be clearly stated.
  • Therefore, for the most part, the collection of data set B1 will not impose any additional burden on respondents.
  • In the production of European statistics there should be a balance between the needs of the users and the burden on respondents.
  • Account should also be taken of the burden on respondents, be they businesses, central, regional or local government units, households or individuals.
  • Member State shall indicate with Y (yes) or N (no) whether administrative sources are used whenever possible to avoid duplication of data collection and reduce burden on respondents.
  • the means by which burdens on respondents will be minimized,
  • The ECB supports the aim of proposed regulation 2 to introduce definitions and reference dates which strike an appropriate balance between user needs and the burden placed on respondents.
  • A balance should be struck between the needs of the users and the burden on respondents when producing European statistics.
  • Account is to be taken of the burden on respondents, be they business, households or individuals.
  • Conversely, without prejudice to the burden on respondents, the regulations related to those sources should enable a better identification of cross-border transactions, especially as regards services.

Alternatives:

  • activate intent reasoning in respondents
  • stimulate intent-based reasoning in respondents

trigger in depth reasoning on respondents

This phrase is correct and is used to suggest prompting respondents to engage in thorough or detailed reasoning.

This phrase is suitable when you want to emphasize that respondents are being encouraged to conduct detailed or comprehensive reasoning.
  • Cost associated with the collection and production of a statistical product and burden on respondents.
  • 1. The collection of data shall be based where possible on available sources, minimising the burden on respondents.
  • Administrative data sources may be used to reduce the burden on respondents.
  • It also aims at reducing the burden on respondents.
  • The collection of data will not impose any additional burden on respondents.
  • For administrative sources, the burden on respondents resulting from additional questions for statistical purposes should be evaluated.
  • The group-level resolution authority shall provide reasoning on:
  • I don't believe that reasoning on the undervalued power of intelligence can offer any miraculous solutions.
  • All my reasoning on whether to leave or not came in a flash.
  • All this necessarily leads to reasoning on the basis of different methodologies within the same company.
  • The aim of reducing the burden on respondents and the national statistical institutes should be clearly stated.
  • Therefore, for the most part, the collection of data set B1 will not impose any additional burden on respondents.
  • In the production of European statistics there should be a balance between the needs of the users and the burden on respondents.
  • Account should also be taken of the burden on respondents, be they businesses, central, regional or local government units, households or individuals.
  • Member State shall indicate with Y (yes) or N (no) whether administrative sources are used whenever possible to avoid duplication of data collection and reduce burden on respondents.
  • the means by which burdens on respondents will be minimized,
  • The ECB supports the aim of proposed regulation 2 to introduce definitions and reference dates which strike an appropriate balance between user needs and the burden placed on respondents.
  • A balance should be struck between the needs of the users and the burden on respondents when producing European statistics.
  • Account is to be taken of the burden on respondents, be they business, households or individuals.
  • Conversely, without prejudice to the burden on respondents, the regulations related to those sources should enable a better identification of cross-border transactions, especially as regards services.

Alternatives:

  • prompt in-depth reasoning in respondents
  • encourage thorough reasoning in respondents

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

⚡️ Black Friday 2024 ⚡️

Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!