"training imparted" vs "training imparted to"

Question

"training imparted" vs "training imparted to"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Training imparted' is used when the focus is on the action of providing training, while 'training imparted to' is used when specifying the recipient of the training. They are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to describe the action of providing training without specifying the recipient.

Examples:

The training imparted was comprehensive.
The quality of the training imparted was exceptional.

Alternatives:

training provided
training delivered
training conducted

This phrase is used when specifying the recipient of the training.

Examples:

The training imparted to the new employees was effective.
The training imparted to the team members was tailored to their needs.

Alternatives:

training provided to
training delivered to
training conducted for

Answer 1

training imparted

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

training imparted to

This phrase is also correct and commonly used in English.

"training imparted" vs "training imparted to"

training imparted

training imparted to

Related Comparisons