TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

towards the appeal judgment vs against the appeal judgment

Both phrases are correct, but they convey different meanings. 'Towards the appeal judgment' implies a positive or supportive attitude, while 'against the appeal judgment' indicates a negative or opposing stance. The choice between the two depends on the intended meaning or perspective of the speaker.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 601 views

towards the appeal judgment

This phrase is correct and can be used to indicate a positive or supportive attitude towards the appeal judgment.

This phrase is used when someone is expressing a positive or supportive stance regarding the appeal judgment.
  • There shall be no further ordinary appeal or cassation against an appeal judgment.
  • - for an appeal judgment, the provision is based on Article 61 of the Statute relating to appeals,
  • I never understood the appeal of parenthood.
  • I never understood the appeal of jewelry.
  • Your lawyer called me for the appeal.
  • The states themselves are shortening the appeals process.
  • The appeal shall include all supporting information and reasoned objections.
  • The appeal proceedings started in February.
  • If the appeal is concluded in favour of the appellant, the appeal charges paid shall be reimbursed by the Agency.
  • The appeal must also give a postal address and telephone number that can be used to communicate with the appellant on matters relating to the appeal.
  • The appeal must give a postal address and telephone number that can be used to communicate with the appellant on matters relating to the appeal.
  • The appeal must give a postal address and telephone number that can be used to communicate with the appellant on matters relating to the appeal.
  • The Appeals Board may require the production of any document that it deems useful for the consideration of the appeal before it.
  • The Appeals Board may require the production of any document that it deems useful for the consideration of the appeal before it.
  • If the appeal is concluded in favour of the appellant, the appeal charges paid shall be reimbursed by the Agency without delay.
  • If the application is made prior to the appeal which the applicant for legal aid intends to commence, it shall briefly state the subject of the appeal.
  • Now gently lift it towards the midline.
  • Headed towards the service area now.
  • - towards the guys, please.
  • The explosive load designed to implode towards the body.

Alternatives:

  • in favor of the appeal judgment
  • supporting the appeal judgment
  • favoring the appeal judgment
  • backing the appeal judgment
  • in support of the appeal judgment

against the appeal judgment

This phrase is correct and is used to indicate a negative or opposing stance towards the appeal judgment.

This phrase is employed when someone is expressing a negative or opposing viewpoint regarding the appeal judgment.
  • The appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance was dismissed on 2 April 2009 by the Court of Justice, in Case C-202/07 P France Télécom v Commission ECR I-2369.
  • The Commission did not appeal against the judgment.
  • The appellant justifies his appeal against the above judgment as follows.
  • Furthermore, the Commission's appeal against the judgment of the CFI is still pending.
  • The Commission did not appeal against the judgment of the General Court.
  • The appeal against the judgment, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action brought by the appellant against Commission Decision 2005/471/EC of 27 November 2002, is based on three pleas in law.
  • allow the Appeal against the judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 (Case T-108/09);
  • declare that the appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 12 September 2007 in Case T-363/04 for infringement of Community law was lodged in good time and in due form;
  • The Commission decided not to lodge an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2006.
  • The Appellant relies upon three grounds of appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance.
  • Appeals against the judgments of the Court of First Instance are pending in the Court of Justice [5].
  • The Commission relies on a single plea against the judgment under appeal, alleging a breach of Community law in paragraphs 79 to 91 of that judgment.
  • The appellant argues four grounds in support of its appeal against the above judgment of the Court of First Instance.
  • Appeal against the foreign judgment whose enforcement is sought (Article 46)
  • In support of its appeal against the aforementioned judgment, the appellant makes the following submissions:
  • allow the Appeal against the Judgment of the General Court and annul the Judgment of the General Court, to annul the decision of the fourth Board of Appeal and, as appropriate, the decision of the Opposition Division;
  • Summary of the grounds of appeal raised by the appellant in the appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 September 2007 in Case T-304/05
  • The Court of Justice dismissed the appeal against this judgment (Judgment of 8 December 2011 in Case C-81/10 P France Télécom, see in particular points 43 et seq.).
  • A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in another Member State may stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal against the judgment has been lodged.
  • A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in another Member State may stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal against the judgment has been lodged.

Alternatives:

  • opposing the appeal judgment
  • contrary to the appeal judgment
  • challenging the appeal judgment
  • disagreeing with the appeal judgment
  • not in favor of the appeal judgment

Related Comparisons

against the appeal judgment vs to the appeal judgment following is a brief summary about vs the unfair judgment the unfair judgment vs a brief summary about the unfair judgment vs a brief summary about each item the unfair judgment vs a breif summary about each item appeal to people's pathos vs appeal to pathos

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!