"To keep consistency" vs "for sake of consistency, we"

Question

"To keep consistency" vs "for sake of consistency, we"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'To keep consistency' is more direct and concise, suitable for stating a simple action. 'For the sake of consistency, we' is a more formal and explanatory way to express the reason behind an action. The choice between them depends on the level of formality and detail required in the context.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the action of maintaining consistency in a process or situation.

Examples:

We need to follow the guidelines to keep consistency in our work.
To keep consistency, please use the same font throughout the document.

Alternatives:

to maintain consistency
to ensure consistency
to uphold consistency
to preserve consistency
to retain consistency

This phrase is used to explain that a particular action is being taken in order to maintain consistency.

Examples:

For the sake of consistency, we have decided to use the same color scheme for all our products.
We are implementing these changes for the sake of consistency in our procedures.

Alternatives:

for consistency's sake, we
in the interest of consistency, we
to ensure consistency, we
to maintain consistency, we
to uphold consistency, we

Answer 1

To keep consistency

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

for sake of consistency, we

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English, especially in formal contexts.

"To keep consistency" vs "for sake of consistency, we"

To keep consistency

for sake of consistency, we

Related Comparisons