"to dampen the effect of" vs "to dampen the negative effect of"

Question

"to dampen the effect of" vs "to dampen the negative effect of"

Both phrases are correct, but "to dampen the effect of" is more concise and commonly used. Adding "negative" before "effect" is redundant as "dampen" already implies reducing or lessening something negative.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to describe the action of reducing or lessening the impact or influence of something.

This phrase can be used to emphasize that the effect being reduced is negative in nature, but it is not necessary for clarity.

Answer 1

to dampen the effect of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

to dampen the negative effect of

This phrase is correct but less commonly used. It is redundant to add "negative" before "effect" as "dampen" already implies reducing or lessening something negative.

"to dampen the effect of" vs "to dampen the negative effect of"

to dampen the effect of

to dampen the negative effect of

Related Comparisons